I'm still not interested in 3D.It's possible to have both.
Or for that matter shaky cams and other gimmicky stuff.
I wonder why nobody complains about the shaky cam fad.
That's so unspecific as to be meaningless.
Okay....
Three dimensional movies this weekend (Thor, etc.) had 60% of their ticket sales from 2D showings.
No.
How many screens? How many shows?
How does the box office take stand in comparison to the ticket sales?
A quick search on 3D telly sales, seems to indicate the opposite however. True the manufacturers might be overstating.
It's not that they're overstating, but it's that they're not discussing sell-through, IE, what actually gets to the consumer. Best Buy, for instance, bought a huge number (something like 100,000 sets) of 3D TVs (particularly large-screen ones) back for last year's Christmas sales. These ARE sales for the manufacturers. Trouble is, Best Buy has taken a complete bath on them and have already started doing massive returns of them to manufacturers.
To me, the more telling point is that you cannot get a 3D TV from either Wal*Mart or Target, proving that there is virtually now 'regular home' penetration for the products.
This article parses pretty insanely. "We're doing better with 3D TV now than HDTV did in its first six months!" That's not exactly saying much since the first six months of HDTV was stuck in format litigation and congressional politicking.
This one is fairly self-selecting, and filled with a lot of spin. "Our NEXT TV will be 3D ready!" is a recurring mantra. But there's no comment on when that next TV is going to be. Worse, the survey is self-selected by LG, one of the companies pushing 3D Television the most. Can this article really be taken at face value? It would be like Phillip Morris surveying 2000 people about the pleasures of ciagrettes, or the DNC surveying 2000 people about Obama's job performance...
I hope that 3D doesnt become the norm and 2D dies because there are some of us who cant see 3D. Besides that for "normal" people who can see 3D doesnt it cause headaches after pro-longed watching?
Not for the vast majority, no.
I don't care if fat people can tolerate 3D or not, what about us normal people.
I'm still not interested in 3D.
Or for that matter shaky cams and other gimmicky stuff.
I wonder why nobody complains about the shaky cam fad.
People complain about "shaky cam" all the time. I don't see your point.
^^ Yeah, and it gives me a headache.
^^ Yeah, and it gives me a headache.
Which doesn't change the facts. It's not a fad and it's not going anywhere.
I do agree however that it is often overused particularly when it was brand new.
^^ Yeah, and it gives me a headache.
Which doesn't change the facts. It's not a fad and it's not going anywhere.
I do agree however that it is often overused particularly when it was brand new.
Why is shaky cam not a fad, but 3D is?
Shaky cam is an overused technique...that makes me nauseous. Enough already.
Obviously, Hollywood makes a lot of films with spectacle as a selling point, but is there really ever going to be a reason for intimate dramas, say, to go 3D?
Yes, because we see the world in 3D. Is there a reason for intimate dramas to be in color? I don't know what the next step will be (smell-o-vision, touch-o-vision?) but I'm sure there will be the same kind of discussions.
3D isn't a fad. The people saying it are incorrect. 3d was a fad in the 50's and 80's but not today. It's far more successful today than in the past and there is a lot more investment in it now.
What does 1080i etc.. have to do with Widescreen SD TV's as I stated pre-HD
I think the point was that it wasn't Retail Sales, it was Distributors buying them to sell Retail, and they didn't sell as well for the Retailers as was expected, hence they ended up with a backlog they're dumping for cheap or returning. How many go into the store, isn't as important as how many the store sells or doesn't sell.^Which is sort of my point we have a reatiler saying 30% of TVs sold (within a two week period) were 3D ready. So could we be seeing a repeat where other parts of the world embrace the new format before the US?
Looking back at it I found it crazy that someone would by a pan and scan DVD instead of a WS DVD. Even if their TV was 4x3 I was buying Videos in WS format before I even had a WS TV.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.