Start a security company run by weirdoes like Scott's friends. Let me know how it goes.
I don't know about "weirdos" like his friends being hired, though they were practicing to try and put on a more professional presentation, but there are numerous examples of ex-cons using their unique expertise to go on to work as either law enforcement consultants or in private security consulting, so that's not unusual at all. Ex-black-hat hackers go on to become white-hat hackers working for law enforcement as part of their plea deal, or con men go on to start private security consulting firms like Frank Abagnale (who they based
Catch Me if You Can on) did.
No one complained about the concept of the Squad (getting super-criminals to work for the Government). Most complaints are due to everything else in that film.
And the concept of the Squad is way wackier than Luis and co forming a company.
In addition to understandably complaining about how much the movie sucked ass, lots of people complained about why anyone would employ someone as unstable as Harley Quinn or as dangerous as Enchantress, even though that's inherent to the premise of the Suicide Squad. I don't know where you were reading and saw "no one" complaining about that.
This
DC vs Marvel thing you have to bring up
all the time really gets tiresome, though. You need to find a new shtick, or at least be able to refute a Marvel film criticism without reflexively trashing an unrelated DC film to do it, even if the movie you're criticizing was in fact terrible. I did it above defending the ex-con security consulting business in
AM&TW without even having to mention
Suicide Squad. It's not hard. The two films have nothing to do with each other, and the person expressing the criticism about one aspect of the Marvel film might still like the overall film, or in fact feel the same way about the DC film that you do, so it's a ridiculous way to refute their argument.
All this talk about "stakes" gets repetitive after a while. I mean really, with there being 20 movies do people expect them to put the world in danger every single time?
You get that
Gavin was using the "lower stakes but still feels significant to the characters" comment as a compliment to the movie, right? You're so defensive.
But yes, as you and
Gavin both said, not everything needs to have potentially world ending stakes. That's actually one of the things I liked most about this movie, is its tighter focus on Scott's immediate and extended "families" and just trying to help them.