^ What I meant was that the technobabble-laden plot isn't really the kind of thing that's going to pull people into the show. If I've been watching Trek for 30 years and I've got trouble keeping it straight, I can only imagine what it's like for people who've never seen the show.
Plus, the plot is solved by technobabble, not any real character-driven action. If Seven had been unwilling to trust Tuvok during the mind meld, but then he convinced her to trust him, THEN all the other personalities disappeared, you would have had something: Tuvok willing to sacrifice himself to Seven, and Seven reaching to him for help in a way that shows both vulnerability and strength. Instead, the problem goes away because Torres finds the right frequency amplitude for the dampening field. That's what I mean.
The casual fans don't care about the technobabble.
Most are used to sci-fi like Star Wars or Back to the Future where science is also fiction, so technobabble plays right into that. They don't care how a lightsaber or replicator work, they just accept it does. That is why they are called casual viewers and not die hard fans. The casual viewer pays attention to the acting performances in my experances. Mostly only the die hard fans need Trek fiction to be explained scientifically which is why they complain about technobabble.
Good point, exodus. The more invested the viewer is in the show, ie the 'die hard' fans, the more realistic they want their science. I've noticed that as well. I wonder, though, if shatnertage would just prefer a strong character-driven plot resolution rather than a potentially weaker 'technobabble' response. I could get with that.