• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Announcing STAR TREK: DTI and other CLB news

So, that makes, what, three 2011 books we know about now? (The last Typhon Pact book, the next Voyager one - according to Memory Alpha and Beta - and this one)

Four.

New Frontier: Blind Man's Bluff is scheduled for January 2011.
 
Good news! :) I always look forward eagerly to your books, and the subject sounds fascinating.

I suppose this is you giving Star Trek time-travel and temporal mechanics the same treatment "Orion's Hounds" gave cosmozoan life in Trek, or "The Buried Age" gave Trek archeaology? Or your overall tying-it-all-together approach to actual galactic, er, "geography" (fuzzy brain can't remember correct word at present)?

You've dealt with the physical galaxy, then with its history, and now you need to assimilate time itself? :lol:
 
I understand if you can't answer this, but I do have a question. In DTI will they be doing any time traveling themselves? I've never really gone for that interpretation myself, I always thought of them as the guys who came in after all of the time traveling was done, and tried to work out if any damage was done.

Hmm, I'll just say that I consider that an entirely valid, if incomplete, interpretation of how the DTI operates. And as I said, I have no interest in approaching a time-travel story in the conventional way. Which is why focusing on the DTI appealed to me.


One of the things that sometimes drives me crazy about Trek is the way everything is so Starfleet-centric. Given that Lucsly and Dulmer were wearing civilian attire, I hope that you don't end up establishing DTI to be yet another Starfleet division...

I also agree completely with this. I'm always happy to explore the civilian side of the Federation. And most of the extant material about DTI treats it as a federal agency rather than a military one. Which is not to say they wouldn't have Starfleet assistance in some form...


I suppose this is you giving Star Trek time-travel and temporal mechanics the same treatment "Orion's Hounds" gave cosmozoan life in Trek, or "The Buried Age" gave Trek archeaology? Or your overall tying-it-all-together approach to actual galactic, er, "geography" (fuzzy brain can't remember correct word at present)?

You've dealt with the physical galaxy, then with its history, and now you need to assimilate time itself? :lol:

It's... what I do. ;)
 
Dulmer and Lucsly. Mulder and Scully. Of course. Didn't notice that before.

It sounds very interesting though, and I am curious about how you will approach the many "flavours" of time travel that we have seen.

It's also good to see that the novels will continue to experiment with more unconventional story ideas.
 
That one sounds fun - I'd been thinking of pitching a Trek Time War, er, Temporal Cold War thing, but wouldn't have thought of centering on Dulmer and Lucsly.

So, that makes, what, three 2011 books we know about now? (The last Typhon Pact book, the next Voyager one - according to Memory Alpha and Beta - and this one)

Yeah. Just announce the next two Vanguard books and Rise Like Lions, and I'll be feeling like the Trek line is totally back on track. :lol:
 
Its probably the most original idea I've heard in a while. I hope the author is able to capture Dulmer and Lucsly's unique personalities. "Joke?" "Yeah". "We hate those too". :guffaw:
 
Dulmer and Lucsly. Mulder and Scully. Of course. Didn't notice that before.

That's the intent, but somehow it ended up being spelled "Dulmur" in the script, not "Dulmer." And that's also what StarTrek.com and Memory Alpha use, as well as the novelization of "Trials and Tribble-ations." So I'm going with that spelling. (Which should confuse the Memory Beta folks, since their entry spells it "Dulmer" to be consistent with his other prose appearances to date.)

Also, it's pretty clear from the way the actors play their parts (though not so evident in the script) that Lucsly is the senior agent; Dulmur defers to him somewhat and isn't as knowledgeable of certain things. So there's no real Mulder/Scully parallel besides the names.
 
That's the intent, but somehow it ended up being spelled "Dulmur" in the script, not "Dulmer." And that's also what StarTrek.com and Memory Alpha use, as well as the novelization of "Trials and Tribble-ations." So I'm going with that spelling. (Which should confuse the Memory Beta folks, since their entry spells it "Dulmer" to be consistent with his other prose appearances to date.)
I'm sure they'll just chalk it up to alternate timelines...
 
That's the intent, but somehow it ended up being spelled "Dulmur" in the script, not "Dulmer." And that's also what StarTrek.com and Memory Alpha use, as well as the novelization of "Trials and Tribble-ations." So I'm going with that spelling. (Which should confuse the Memory Beta folks, since their entry spells it "Dulmer" to be consistent with his other prose appearances to date.)
I'm sure they'll just chalk it up to alternate timelines...

Quick, Christopher, spite them by introducing within your novel a time-travel clause that prevents them using that very explanation! You now control the "alternate timeline" mythology.

You must use this power only for good, of course.
 
That's the intent, but somehow it ended up being spelled "Dulmur" in the script, not "Dulmer." And that's also what StarTrek.com and Memory Alpha use, as well as the novelization of "Trials and Tribble-ations." So I'm going with that spelling.

Ah, but the Star Trek Encyclopedia uses the Dulmer spelling.
 
^The Encyclopedia also refers to Nella Daren as "Neela," even though (unlike Dulmur/Dulmer) that's completely inconsistent with how it was pronounced onscreen. It's not infallible.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top