Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!
I had no problem with how it was used in this movie. Where I noticed it, and if the complaints of other posters are correct, apparently I didn't notice it every time it was used, I thought it was very effective. If it was overused, I didn't notice it, so I guess that means it wasn't overused for me.
I noticed it a couple times (probably only because I was looking for it after spending too much time reading about it here!), but it never bothered me.
The only time I REALLY noticed it was in the beginning with the Kelvin, but that may have been less lens-flare and more giant star in the background. I'm not positive.
My only notice was when Spock was questioning Kirk and Scotty, but that was probably because I had scene the clip online, and that was on particular clip that people here tore apart over the flares.
I liked the reason about the future being bright and magical with possiblities we can't even see (i.e too bright to see). But i'm getting a bit of an old fogy now so at first i thought it was too new (but i also thought IMAX was too loud and worried about getting ear damage so i'm really out of the trend ) but next time i see the film (with ear plugs or dvd) i bet i will just absorb it as part of the style as someone has already said. But i loved the whole look of the film, i thought it really worked as an entity.
I liked them. The only place I really noticed was where one was used to wipe between two shots during the scene in the bar between Kirk and Uhura. And I just thought it was cool, there.
I loved the shaky cam, and really didn't notice the lens flare until people started discussing it. I have to go watch it a second time and see if I notice it this time.