And some stinkers.
Definitely agree we need it preserved.This is an important cinematic document that should be preserved so future filmmakers can see what was achievable at the time under the circumstances, warts and all. Yes, a certain type of fan will faun over and evangelise about it ad nauseam too. Fine. Let them. The reality is that for better or worse, the "Maclunkey Cut" will be the definitive version going forward, as it was the last one Lucas had a hand in.
I appreciate that they're doing this, but at the same it it should illustrate quite clearly why Lucas had little interest in it himself.
Carefully, painstakingly, and sensitively remastering (note: not restoring, because this is not a thing that ever existed before) a flawed, incomplete, and compromised piece of work is the job of a museum curator, not the original artist. Which is essentially what this is, and that's is how it should be.
This is an important cinematic document that should be preserved so future filmmakers can see what was achievable at the time under the circumstances, warts and all. Yes, a certain type of fan will faun over and evangelise about it ad nauseam too. Fine. Let them. The reality is that for better or worse, the "Maclunkey Cut" will be the definitive version going forward, as it was the last one Lucas had a hand in.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.