"Are you an angel?"Or was it the other way around?![]()
Yeah, Padme totally started it.
"Are you an angel?"Or was it the other way around?![]()
But, yeah, Anakin as 9 always felt odd. Having him a teenager, rebel without a cause style, gearhead, tinkering with machines, trying to save money to help his mom, and aspiring for a better life. It could tie in to the "American Graffiti" ideas, street racing and such while still having the challenges of a hard life.
Palpatine did not kill Padme. Lucas was borrowing from a very old storytelling device of a romantic character being so heartbroken that they do not care to live, thus their heart fails. Lucas was trying very hard to sell the Anakin / Padme relationship as some sweeping, tragic romance, only it never presented that way because the necessary character development was just not there, and there's not a single moment between the two that felt natural, as if they had grown closer in any realistic sense.
That, and Hayden Christensen and Portman gave some rather lifeless, unconvincing performances.
If you start at the cool angry rebellious teenager stage then it's counter-productive
To clarify my point, I don't want Anakin as the stereotypical rebellious teen, but that he rebels against the system of oppression on Tatooine. I agree with Jedi Marso that him even 5 years older makes his skills more understandable and a little more believable in the context of the story and world.Anakin 'able to fix anything' and 'the only human who could race pods' also works MUCH better as a teen or young man. To say nothing of piloting a starfighter in combat! The Force grants a lot of power, but should it make a 9-year old kid with no training a master mechanic?
It's interesting, and something I didn't catch until The Hobbit films, but working in a green screen environment is difficult on even good actors. So, the lack of direction has a double impact when the director has their own struggles.Due to GL's lack of direction and acting completely against green screens, as mentioned above. At least, that's my opinion. Both have delivered solid performances in other releases.
Correction: a 9-year old kid who's probably been forced to work in a junk shop cleaning and reconditioning old parts since he could walk. Have a look at some real history of child labour, especially during the Industrial Revolution. You'd be surprised the kinds of skills 9-year olds can pick up (and the limbs they can loose in the process.)To say nothing of piloting a starfighter in combat! The Force grants a lot of power, but should it make a 9-year old kid with no training a master mechanic?
To clarify my point, I don't want Anakin as the stereotypical rebellious teen, but that he rebels against the system of oppression on Tatooine. I agree with Jedi Marso that him even 5 years older makes his skills more understandable and a little more believable in the context of the story and world.
hahahahahaha(and the limbs they can loose in the process.)
No, I really wouldn't.Correction: a 9-year old kid who's probably been forced to work in a junk shop cleaning and reconditioning old parts since he could walk. Have a look at some real history of child labour, especially during the Industrial Revolution. You'd be surprised the kinds of skills 9-year olds can pick up (and the limbs they can loose in the process.)
Anakin 'able to fix anything' and 'the only human who could race pods' also works MUCH better as a teen or young man. To say nothing of piloting a starfighter in combat! The Force grants a lot of power, but should it make a 9-year old kid with no training a master mechanic?
This is another element that could have handled by starting the two of them as older. Also, there was no need for the mother of Luke and Leia to be some kind of royalty. What if they had flipped the script on this, making Padme a slave as well? Both born and raised on the same planet, growing up together, dreaming of living their own lives together free of their cruel masters. Anakin forced into racing professionally while Padme is the master mechanic who can fix anything. When Qui-gon and Obi-wan show up, they have their chance to gain their freedom
Anakin can win the parts to fix the Jedi starship, while Padme can fix it once he does. Take the story on from there. As Trek_God_1 said, grow the relationship naturally, through shared interests, danger, and hardship. How much more tragic does his fall become then?
To clarify my point, I don't want Anakin as the stereotypical rebellious teen, but that he rebels against the system of oppression on Tatooine. I agree with Jedi Marso that him even 5 years older makes his skills more understandable and a little more believable in the context of the story and world.
Luke had flown a T-16 which was made by the same company and allegedly had similar controls; according to some source Rey had flown before.(almost) no one bats at eye at 9 year old Anakin flying the N-1 fine, and Luke flying an X-Wing fine the first time with no training. But noo Rey flying the Falcon first try is too much.
Rey says "we've got one" when Finn asks about a pilot. Then demonstrates that she can fly.Luke had flown a T-16 which was made by the same company and allegedly had similar controls; according to some source Rey had flown before.
That's what she said!Luke is the best bush pilot in the Outer Rim Territories
Yes, but that was never stated in the film.Luke had flown a T-16 which was made by the same company and allegedly had similar controls
I'd hardly characterise a pod racer as a "street car". Those things are starfighter engines strapped to a seat, steering yoke and not much else. An N1 must have felt like a smooth ride by comparison.Rey says "we've got one" when Finn asks about a pilot. Then demonstrates that she can fly.
In a deleted scene, added again in one special edition, Biggs says that Luke is the best bush pilot in the Outer Rim Territories to Red Leader.
Anakin is a street car racer who jumps in to a fighter jet.
Anakin also identifies himself as a pilot, then demonstrates he can fly. What's the difference?Rey says "we've got one" when Finn asks about a pilot. Then demonstrates that she can fly.
At least we can see the back of the vehicle in the film.Yes, but that was never stated in the film.
Was that meant to be Beggars Canyon?We literally see Anakin racing down Beggar's Canyon.
Nothing.Anakin also identifies himself as a pilot, then demonstrates he can fly. What's the difference?
Allegedly.Was that meant to be Beggars Canyon?
Yup. Specifically labelled as such in various materials from TPM, and even explicitly namedropped in BoBF, which almost exactly recreates certain shots of the same location from the podrace.Was that meant to be Beggars Canyon?
Since it's at Mos Espa I thought it was a different canyon.
Nothing.
Huh. Despite reading every Episode 1 related material I never caught that.Yup. Specifically labelled as such in various materials from TPM, and even explicitly namedropped in BoBF, which almost exactly recreates certain shots of the same location from the podrace.
ILM actually made a hand drawn map of the full course so they could keep everything straight while making the sequence, and you can just about make out the label "Beggar's Canyon" on that section, (though most of the scans you'll find are of pretty low resolution given the size of the thing.) So it was something that comes from the production itself, not made up after the fact.Huh. Despite reading every Episode 1 related material I never caught that.
Today I learned.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.