• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Alien Structure or just rocks? I'm thinking rocks..

Just finished a Com-Link with Larry Niven.

He said, "Tell those guys in the Alien Structures Thread of BBS that they just crack me up!"

:techman:
 
Do you really even need a lot of surface area to get power form the sun--what about coils in orbit spinning against the rotation of the Sun?

You can use rather thin wire to store a lot of energy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage

Size - To achieve commercially useful levels of storage, around 1 GW·h (3.6 TJ), a SMES installation would need a loop of around 100 miles (160 km). This is traditionally pictured as a circle, though in practice it could be more like a rounded rectangle. In either case it would require access to a significant amount of land to house the installation.

Superconductors seem to be progressing: http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/11/superconducting-at-70-degrees-celsius.html

Ideally, you'd want coils around a magnetar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar#Magnetic_field

A magnetar's 10 to the 10th power tesla field, by contrast, has an energy density of 4.0×1025 J/m3, with an E/c2 mass density >104 times that of lead.

It may be that you cannot even see ET's power supply--whip thin?
 
It's much easier to use solar panels to harvest energy for a low-end Kardashev type II civilization, which I guess might also choose to develop fusion energy for deep-space utilization. I suppose you could also extract energy from a star's rotating magnetic field. You might also be able to store magnetic energy in the star by passing current through the coils. Subtle control of such coils might also allow you to dampen or otherwise manage a star's sunspot cycle or perhaps even to move the star. That seems like something a mid to high-end Kardashev type II civ might attempt. Extracting energy from magnetars, pulsars, black holes, etc would seem like activities for a high-end Kardashev type II or low-end type III civ.

There's loads written about this sort of stuff. I'd suggest reading the Wikipedia article as a starter.
 
They're just on Europan vacation.

Yet you pooh-poohed the notion that alien civilisations could not develop around class F stars. Even if the number were one tenth of my estimate, the nearest such structure might still be only 215 ly away.
There are reasonable scenarios that allow civilizations around an F-Star, but as you get deeper into the galactic core it will eventually be impossible to have a stable planetary system. The galaxy has a habitable zone and the bulk of stars is not in it. Also, a Dyson Whatever doesn't just need to be physically and technologically possible, but culturally desirable. Which means that what we're looking at is almost certainly not a Dyson Whatever.

Maybe the aliens are all living in their parents' basements.
If you can create virtual environments that simulate any possible alien world, why go to the expense and take the risk of leaving home? Perhaps you would only abandon your home star when it's dying?
I've long thought that a very likely solution to the Fermi Paradox is that they are all at home on Facebook. They're probably just like us: Most of them couldn't care less, and the ones that do have trouble getting funding.

Just finished a Com-Link with Larry Niven.

He said, "Tell those guys in the Alien Structures Thread of BBS that they just crack me up!"

:techman:
Tell Larry Niven that the Ringworld is STILL unstable. :rommie:

Maybe that's what KIC 8462852 is: The floating debris of a defunct Ringworld.
 
Yeah, the stars in the central bulge are packed a lot closer and are more likely to be sterilised by a supernova. According to https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.1286, the proportion of stars in the Galaxy that can support multicellular life is estimated to be between 0.3% and 1.2%, depending on assumptions. That would increase my estimate for the distance to the nearest megastructure to between 440 and 690 ly and decrease the number of such structures to between 7,500 and 30,000.

ETA: Of course, the number could be higher if civs colonise other star systems over time.

Based on a sample of one that might turn out to be a new type of variable star or a dodgy CCD element...
 
Last edited:
I get a little impatient with stuff like this myself. :rommie: But chances are this will turn out to be like the Wow! Signal and the ambiguous Viking lander tests-- the subject of unresolved discussion for decades.
 
I always believed that the WOW signal was an actual signal that got cut off from the other end. I really do believe this.

We'll never know for sure though, and it will remain a mystery.
 
Cut off? By lack of funding or peasants with pitchforks?

I figured if it was a signal we were just unlucky enough to catch the tail end.
 
Most likely any alien message would be "Shut that crap OFF!!, or I'm gonna come over and shut it for you!"
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top