No matter what CBS will fall back on TOS. It has been that way since the marketing kits I saw for Trek 09 (probably longer).Yes, that's supposition on my part. But it doesn't change the point I was trying to make.
No matter what CBS will fall back on TOS. It has been that way since the marketing kits I saw for Trek 09 (probably longer).Yes, that's supposition on my part. But it doesn't change the point I was trying to make.
No matter what CBS will fall back on TOS. It has been that way since the marketing kits I saw for Trek 09 (probably longer).
Yup.Then you're correct that Star Trek will never innovate.
I thought the spore drive was innovative.
And that's my point: if the marketing department said "Connect the show to TOS and you'll get more viewers and they'll buy more merchandise," and that actually happened, then I'd understand. But I don't think connecting DSC to TOS instantly created more viewers or helped sell more toys.
I'll quote @CorporalClegg above: No.
Ask Brian Fuller.Dunno why DIS threw it all out.
The spore drive and the mycelial network is probably my favourite science fantasy concept in all of trek. Its weird and wonderful and harkened back to the balls to the wall high concept crazy ideas of TOS. 90's trek never had enough of that in my opinion.It was. Unfortunately it got bogged down with canonistas complaining about "why didn't Voyager just use it to get home?" or other such conversations, instead of just accepting it on its own merits. Which is what happens when you try to innovate but are still stuck in the past.
The design of TOS is influenced heavily by the 60s and that just doesn't work on TV without being cheesy. The updated Enterprise took the core elements of the original design and just used the more modern technology seen on Discovery. Reality overtook the futurism of TOS, in some cases due to inspiration from TOS. It can't look exactly the same but you can pay it homage and I feel they did that.Yes, but that wasn't quite my point. If DSC was being billed as a 10-years-before prequel to TOS, then the producers should have tried to make it look like TOS with a more updated aesthetic. What they did instead, in my opinion, was to make it look like any other sci-fi show produced in the 2000's. And while the production values themselves are top-notch, the actual look and feel of the show is about as far from the TOS aesthetic as you can get. But I've mentioned this all before and really don't feel like getting into a semantics argument about it.
I thought it might be the 3000th season of The Good PlaceI like the new uniforms up to a point. They look in the same vain as the Relativity's. But I'm glad it looks like the Discovery crew will be sticking with their own uniforms.
I really hate saying this, but I think the old guy looks like Alfred from the Adam West Batman.
The design of TOS is influenced heavily by the 60s and that just doesn't work on TV without being cheesy.
so far they've only shown two admirals in them. I wonder if those are just the dress uniforms.
they’re clearly ignoring Gene’s vision.Pockets!!!
Not if ones sees it through the booze and all night 'affairs' he preferred at times.they’re clearly ignoring Gene’s vision.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.