• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Ah, the NEW uniforms...!

Then you're correct that Star Trek will never innovate.
Yup.

I see no path forward in that regard. So, it will be entertaining enough but it will never, ever, be more than entertainment.

Mileage will vary if that is a good thing or not. Personally, I have no issue with it. Not everything must be zeitgeist, cultural touchstone, bullshit to be enjoyable.
 
I thought the spore drive was innovative.

It was. Unfortunately it got bogged down with canonistas complaining about "why didn't Voyager just use it to get home?" or other such conversations, instead of just accepting it on its own merits. Which is what happens when you try to innovate but are still stuck in the past.
 
And that's my point: if the marketing department said "Connect the show to TOS and you'll get more viewers and they'll buy more merchandise," and that actually happened, then I'd understand. But I don't think connecting DSC to TOS instantly created more viewers or helped sell more toys.



I'll quote @CorporalClegg above: No.

Like we've had updated TOS stuff. In Ent. It looked fine. Then in the movies. A bit too big in places, and the ship design for the Big E and Vengeance still come out of nowhere, compared to the more hoo-hum designs of Kelvin and Newton and etc.

Turn the consoles to actual computer screens. Add some texture. Maybe flatten a bit of the tech. Small details to flesh it out. The Enterprise looked advanced in Ent, because it bloody well was, but it's still a light Cruiser by the TNG era, or around a frigate or less! by the 3000s. It's a small ship but got the job done.

Dunno why DIS threw it all out. Especially for a uniform that fits the 2200s, if that, than the 2250s, and ship designs, or rather, detailing, that doesn't fit really anywhere....

Re: Bajoran Influence: Bajor was a major interstellar power once and they're ancient. More ancient than the Vulcans. I can easily see them, with the wormhole, being the center of a new trans-quadrant Federation, especially if Impulse is all you got.

Re: Uniforms: Getting a strong 09 Cadet vibe than anything else; the Bajoran stuff is there, but I thought 'Didn't I see Chris Pine in that?'
 
d0GKos4.png
 
It was. Unfortunately it got bogged down with canonistas complaining about "why didn't Voyager just use it to get home?" or other such conversations, instead of just accepting it on its own merits. Which is what happens when you try to innovate but are still stuck in the past.
The spore drive and the mycelial network is probably my favourite science fantasy concept in all of trek. Its weird and wonderful and harkened back to the balls to the wall high concept crazy ideas of TOS. 90's trek never had enough of that in my opinion.
 
Yes, but that wasn't quite my point. If DSC was being billed as a 10-years-before prequel to TOS, then the producers should have tried to make it look like TOS with a more updated aesthetic. What they did instead, in my opinion, was to make it look like any other sci-fi show produced in the 2000's. And while the production values themselves are top-notch, the actual look and feel of the show is about as far from the TOS aesthetic as you can get. But I've mentioned this all before and really don't feel like getting into a semantics argument about it.
The design of TOS is influenced heavily by the 60s and that just doesn't work on TV without being cheesy. The updated Enterprise took the core elements of the original design and just used the more modern technology seen on Discovery. Reality overtook the futurism of TOS, in some cases due to inspiration from TOS. It can't look exactly the same but you can pay it homage and I feel they did that.
 
The design of TOS is influenced heavily by the 60s and that just doesn't work on TV without being cheesy.

Pike & crew showing up on Discovery (not to mention the upcoming Strange New Worlds) show that the TOS aesthetic can be referred to and updated without looking cheesy. I'd argue that it could look better than the mostly fine job they did with Pike and the Enterprise on Discovery, but what they came up with is perfectly acceptable.

I'm not one who felt that, as a prequel, Discovery needed to adhere extremely closely to the TOS look, but I do think it should have and could have come far closer than it did without sacrificing believability to new audiences. It just would've taken effort and imagination -- both of which they were able to muster up reasonably well some months later when they gave us Pike.

In terms of canon: sometimes it's broken for logical reasons, such as allowing expansion of the universe, or to maintain relevance to modern audiences. It's when canon is broken needlessly out of either ignorance or laziness that the current keepers of the Star Trek kingdom do a disservice to fans both past and future. As a fan, it's painful to watch the decades-old tapestry get trampled upon for no good reason. As a person with a creative mind, it's aggravating to know it's possible to avoid that damage by making otherwise benign, alternate creative decisions.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top