After Trek 11 replace TOS 1701 with prequel Enterprise
- Thread starter DumbDumb2007
- Start date
Let's see every episode of TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT rewritten to be watchable by the modern audiences that will love Trek XI, and then replace their old fashioned FX with the new, much cooler Trek XI ship!
Then we'll just forget there ever was any other Trek at all! That would be da bomb! :thumbsup:
"Let's see every episode of TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT rewritten to be watchable by the modern audiences that will love Trek XI, and then replace their old fashioned FX with the new, much cooler Trek XI ship!"
Yes! I agree! Hee hee! :thumbsup:
Oh wait...
Oh f&ck! Sarcasm, correct?
Yes! I agree! Hee hee! :thumbsup:
Oh wait...
Oh f&ck! Sarcasm, correct?
Yeah, d&psh%t! The only thing kewler than that idea is yur posts! 
And sarcasm is da bomb!
Rottentomato™ DumbPosts™ 1347 and climbing!
And sarcasm is da bomb!
Rottentomato™ DumbPosts™ 1347 and climbing!
"Spock's Brain" kills kittens.
There. Someone with the balls had to say it.
There. Someone with the balls had to say it.
Sandra Smith(Janice Lester)had a nice ass. That HAD to amount to something.
Not MUCH I admit. But at least the antagonist in the episode wasn't another talking volcanic rock alien.
Not MUCH I admit. But at least the antagonist in the episode wasn't another talking volcanic rock alien.
Imagine the dilemma if Kirk was stuck in Lester's body.
Would he then be forced to hit on himself?
Would he then be forced to hit on himself?
I hope it looks like the refit version as seen in TMP.
Interesting that in the first 3rd season episode aired, Spock loses his brain and in the final one aired, Kirk loses his balls....
And don't even ASK about his gigantic man-clit.
I just want to know if it has the goose-necked data displays that were around in Pike's era.
I'm pretty sure Abrams and his crew want to have their cake and eat it too. They'll say the new movie takes place between the two pilots The Cage and Where No Man Has Gone Before despite the fact that everything probably won't fit realistically in the visual design lineage. Everyone involved with this new film has pretty much said most things will look radically different than it is suppose to. My prediction is that the movie will be a remake that, for the most part, will remain faithful to the original canon. But rather than be honest, they'll say it isn't a remake. Despite the fact that they want the unfamiliar public to think exactly that with the title simply being "Star Trek".
I think this is sad because it seems like they're using this as an excuse to snub William Shatner. If they put him in, they'll know the fans will realize they weren't being serious about this not being a reboot. Which I don't understand because they don't need the fans. And even if this film isn't a remake, if this film uses time travel and alternate timelines, why not have Shatner's Kirk exist in another timeline and assist Spock, knowing he'll cease to exist if his friend is successful? JJ Abrams said he didn't want to come off as a fan boy by adding in Shatner, but that's flagrantly hypocritical of him. Having Leonard Nimoy's Spock come back through time travel isn't fan boyish? How does that premise not sound like fan fiction? This angers me a little, but only because of my loyal invested interest in Star Trek, especially TOS, which doesn't seem to matter anymore.
Either way, I believe we the fans no longer count. No amount of online feet stomping will change that. I'm going into the film with very low expectations, which is probably the best way to avoid massive disappointment. I'm also going to pretend this movie doesn't really count. It takes place in another universe very similar to the one we know and love, so it is okay to enjoy myself.
Heed this warning die-hard TNG fans. It is only a matter of time before they recast your show and some stranger puts his dick in the iconic art designs you love too.
I'm not even into BDSM, and yet your comment made me stand at attention. I'm learning new things about myself everyday. Or maybe it was Joanne Linville....
Last edited:
TheCanon72
Lieutenant
They have been honest that it will be a remake.
Just like Superman Returns, King Kong, and The Maltese Falcon.
...
Why is this surprising?
Just like Superman Returns, King Kong, and The Maltese Falcon.
...
Why is this surprising?
No, they're saying this is a prequel.
I like StarMan. But, yeah.
That idea is dumber than putting chicken blood on your dick and having a rabid rottweilier clean it off.
If it spans eras covered by TOS and its movies, how can it be a prequel?
The bulk of it is set prior to the TOS Kirk episodes(2265-69), so technically it's a prequel.
Similar threads
