Marc here (video to follow) posits a great point, comparing to when Trek used to explore strange new worlds - but replaced it with character drama/conflict (which Discovery isn't the first spinoff to do, but I'd wager (50 Quatloos) the issue is of degree, excessive or otherwise...)
Disclaimer: He's probably listened to Doomcock as he's mentioned the "they're changing everything because they want to destroy it" counter-pop culture belief (which I disagree with somewhat, but that's a separate issue), but he still has a great point that TOS let the imagination run wild but (TNG onward) hinges more on drama than things that could be seen as "weird" and, IMHO, sci-fi is supposed to be weird. As long as there's coherence in the storylines and no magic wands, LOL.
Has Trek, over the decades, placed drama over imagination? Marc sorta points out the issues of imagination and diversity being there from the start. TOS is dated in some ways but a lot more seem rewatchable compared to a few decades ago...
Disclaimer: He's probably listened to Doomcock as he's mentioned the "they're changing everything because they want to destroy it" counter-pop culture belief (which I disagree with somewhat, but that's a separate issue), but he still has a great point that TOS let the imagination run wild but (TNG onward) hinges more on drama than things that could be seen as "weird" and, IMHO, sci-fi is supposed to be weird. As long as there's coherence in the storylines and no magic wands, LOL.
Has Trek, over the decades, placed drama over imagination? Marc sorta points out the issues of imagination and diversity being there from the start. TOS is dated in some ways but a lot more seem rewatchable compared to a few decades ago...