With the Academy Awards for 2009 being handed out tomorrow, part of the debate over who should win always revolves around which films will be remembered in the long-term (with accusations that others will age badly). There are indeed consenus opinions formed about some films as being unworthy winners. Here, defend past winners you think are now unfairly maligned.
For my part:
Shakespeare in Love - this was an upset winner over Saving Private Ryan, and the complaints started pretty much as soon as it won. But personally, I would have voted for it. SPR is a tremendous technical achievement, particularly the opening (which revolutionized depictions of combat on film), but I never found its story especially involving. Shakespeare in Love's got a much more interesting screenplay. Plus, it's nice to see a comedy win, which is rare enough.
For my part:
Shakespeare in Love - this was an upset winner over Saving Private Ryan, and the complaints started pretty much as soon as it won. But personally, I would have voted for it. SPR is a tremendous technical achievement, particularly the opening (which revolutionized depictions of combat on film), but I never found its story especially involving. Shakespeare in Love's got a much more interesting screenplay. Plus, it's nice to see a comedy win, which is rare enough.