• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Abrams' Star Trek Up for Ray Bradbury Award!

Not everyone who came out of the theatre was particularly satisfied with the last film, and won't be very interested in another offering of more of the same. And considering the budget that was just as bloated and misshapen as the JJprise, that astounding box office take only managed for this thing to break even; it was nice for Paramount prestige-wise, but it didn't turn a big profit.

Long story short, if this next one "underperforms", it may very well be the last chapter in this incarnation of the franchise.

At least until the next wunderkind comes along with an idea for a reboot.
 
Not everyone who came out of the theatre was particularly satisfied with the last film, and won't be very interested in another offering of more of the same. And considering the budget that was just as bloated and misshapen as the JJprise, that astounding box office take only managed for this thing to break even; it was nice for Paramount prestige-wise, but it didn't turn a big profit.

Long story short, if this next one "underperforms", it may very well be the last chapter in this incarnation of the franchise.

At least until the next wunderkind comes along with an idea for a reboot.

You wish.:rolleyes:

Im sure you polled everyone, just to see how dissatisfied they were with the film. This film could have put up Avatar like numbers, and you would somehow make it seem like it was a failure.
 
If they'd put together a coherent plot, it might very well have put up Avatar-type numbers. As it was, it only ranked as a typical summer blockbuster. And has about as much staying power.

That's your mainstream success. Enjoy it while it lasts.
 
Not everyone who came out of the theatre was particularly satisfied with the last film...

At least ninety percent were. :lol:

Really, it's a great success. You can't rationalize that away no matter how hard you try.

A big success.

Far, far more popular and a greater success than any previous Star Trek film.

That's it. Period. Full stop. Check, please. :)

And yep, some day when this version flags in popularity another "wunderkind" will come along and reboot Star Trek again.

You know what won't happen?

The studio will never back up to recreate the older version of Trek that the complainers prefer. It's dead, ended forever. You'll see it again when a waltz is number one on Billboard's Top 100 hits. ;)

So, really, arguments about how the bridge fits in that dome are passe; yesterday's trivia.
 
Not everyone who came out of the theatre was particularly satisfied with the last film,

What a new concept, some people didn't like the film?

and won't be very interested in another offering of more of the same. And considering the budget that was just as bloated and misshapen as the JJprise, that astounding box office take only managed for this thing to break even; it was nice for Paramount prestige-wise, but it didn't turn a big profit.

According to? Show us Paramount's accounting information. Interestingly enough, PowderedToast posted on his site's comment blog that Paramount were apparently turning a profit just a few weeks after the film came out, and continued to do so with how well it did in blu-ray/dvd.



Long story short, if this next one "underperforms",

Then it still would have outperformed most other Trek. :techman:
 
...t was nice for Paramount prestige-wise, but it didn't turn a big profit.

According to? Show us Paramount's accounting information.

He can't, because he's talking through his hat. Fans can be very inventive and selective about the misinformation and rumor that they use as bases for their, uh, financial speculations. As is so often the case, he's wrong here.
 
The reported budget was in the $150 million range, meaning that to make back its costs, which included not just production but promotion and distribution, it needed to make over $300 million, which is right around what it did wind up making at the box office, i.e., it broke even.
 
The reported budget was in the $150 million range, meaning that to make back its costs, which included not just production but promotion and distribution, it needed to make over $300 million, which is right around what it did wind up making at the box office, i.e., it broke even.

In the US alone from box office alone. Add in overseas and DVD/Blu-ray sales, and they made several hundred million dollars.
 
The reported budget was in the $150 million range, meaning that to make back its costs, which included not just production but promotion and distribution, it needed to make over $300 million, which is right around what it did wind up making at the box office, i.e., it broke even.

You're still guessing. And it made $385 Million worldwide just on theater box office.
 
The reported budget was in the $150 million range, meaning that to make back its costs, which included not just production but promotion and distribution, it needed to make over $300 million, which is right around what it did wind up making at the box office, i.e., it broke even.

Picking up a back-of-the-envelope formula from a fan magazine years ago and applying it uncritically and in a vacuum of actual information yields no conclusions worthy of consideration. That's what you've done here, and your conclusions are without value.

In fact, the people actually concerned - the studio and investors - know very well how successful this film has been for them and that is why Star Trek will now continue in this vein with the current writers, producers and cast at the helm. Your uninformed rationalizations look pretty foolish in light of that simple fact.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top