'The needs of the one...''The needs of the many...'![]()
All it would take is one throwaway line about shuttle production and I would cancel the deductions. BSG did this, in the episode Scar Roslin explains that they are mining an asteroid for metal used to build more Viper fighters, so if Voyager explains that they are forced to build more shuttles I will excuse them.Given how quickly they constructed the Delta Flyer and how easily they managed to rebuild it in Season 7, it wouldn't strain my disbelief to believe they're capable of building their own shuttles (and there are plenty of other things that DO strain my disbelief to varying degrees elsewhere that I don't need any more help in that department anyway) - I personally wouldn't deduct points for that, but hey, you're the one reviewing, you rate them how you wish.
I wonder about that myself sometimes, I know he used it in the final season so was it just sitting in the shuttle bay all that time? How much room did they have down there to store all these shuttles, Neelix's ship and the Delta Flyer? It wasn't a big ship.I wonder why they didn't use Neelix's ship more often? We only saw it once or twice, but I think it was bigger than Voyager's shuttles. It just sat somewhere in Voyager for the best part of seven years.
'The needs of the one...''The needs of the many...'![]()
![]()
I agree... and from what I remember, I'm pretty sure you won't be excusing them.All it would take is one throwaway line about shuttle production and I would cancel the deductions. BSG did this, in the episode Scar Roslin explains that they are mining an asteroid for metal used to build more Viper fighters, so if Voyager explains that they are forced to build more shuttles I will excuse them.Given how quickly they constructed the Delta Flyer and how easily they managed to rebuild it in Season 7, it wouldn't strain my disbelief to believe they're capable of building their own shuttles (and there are plenty of other things that DO strain my disbelief to varying degrees elsewhere that I don't need any more help in that department anyway) - I personally wouldn't deduct points for that, but hey, you're the one reviewing, you rate them how you wish.
Clearly, the writers often forgot this and thought they were still writing for the D. Sometimes I just wonder how much they questioned Mr. Sternbach on the features he'd designed into the ship, because I know he had it thought out pretty well. I always thought Neelix's ship was going to get some kind of regular useage after 'Caretaker.' Clearly it was a relatively capable ship, and upgraded with Federation technology it would have been more capable. When we finally saw the interior, I thought maybe they were taking their time in showing the exterior because they wanted to develop a really cool exterior design because they were going to use it a lot. As such, apparently not. So they let it take up all that space in the shuttlebay? I'm surprised Janeway didn't order Neelix to sell it or dismantle it for space. Maybe they could beam it into the cargo bay somehow?I wonder about that myself sometimes, I know he used it in the final season so was it just sitting in the shuttle bay all that time? How much room did they have down there to store all these shuttles, Neelix's ship and the Delta Flyer? It wasn't a big ship.I wonder why they didn't use Neelix's ship more often? We only saw it once or twice, but I think it was bigger than Voyager's shuttles. It just sat somewhere in Voyager for the best part of seven years.![]()
Basics, Part 1 (***)
Star Trek has one big problem; the first time they attempted a season ending cliffhanger they nailed it so perfectly that every time they tried it since they just weren't able to match it.
For seven years I watched Voyager, and for seven years I looked at the underbelly of the saucer and thought I saw a ship stuck on there. I thought it might have been the captain's yacht, but a few years back I learned that this was the aerowing shuttle which the designers put on there in case the writers ever decided to use it.Sometimes I just wonder how much they questioned Mr. Sternbach on the features he'd designed into the ship, because I know he had it thought out pretty well.
For seven years I watched Voyager, and for seven years I looked at the underbelly of the saucer and thought I saw a ship stuck on there. I thought it might have been the captain's yacht, but a few years back I learned that this was the aerowing shuttle which the designers put on there in case the writers ever decided to use it.Sometimes I just wonder how much they questioned Mr. Sternbach on the features he'd designed into the ship, because I know he had it thought out pretty well.
That is a fantastic concept! Why wasn't that used instead of the Delta Flyer, which is a ship I never warmed to?
The more I read about this show the more it seems like the production and visual effects guys should have been writing it.
While I was always okay with the Delta Flyer in concept, it would have been better technical continuity to have used the aeroshuttle. Plus, they could have made use of DS9's runabout cockpit set for the aeroshuttle cockpit. *sigh*According to Rob Bonchune, who eventually created a full rendering of the AeroShuttle, "In a nutshell, back at Foundation, we got into our heads that it would be cool to see the "captain's yacht" of the Voyager, that being the AeroShuttle. Rick Sternbach gratuitously did a prelim design and I used part of that and designed the ship you see here. Mojo and I did a whole launch sequence, on spec, meaning "free" and then had it shown to Rick Berman. The response: Mr Berman thought it was nice, but didn't want to trump the captain's yacht launch sequence from the upcoming film Star Trek: Insurrection. As you remember that was a VERY dramatic, epic and cool launch sequence."
With regards to the design, Bonchune stated, "Well, I remember Rick Sternbach saying that the four protruding rectangles represent landing pads. Seems silly as in scale they are way oversized. But, for the big Voyager miniature, I guess it was added detail."
As for what happened to the initial project, Bonchune stated that "if we had aired the ship, I was going to refine the wings to be a little less "blunt trauma" to the aerodynamics. But when we got nixed, we moved on... so, it stands as is."
I suppose you could theorise that it was just a "plug", and the actual ship wasn't due to be installed until Tuesday.
As for the impossibly vast shuttlebay, clearly Voyager was augmented with Gallifreyan technology, and is in fact dimensionally transcendental.
*double sigh*Rick Sternbach's Star Trek: The Magazine article, "Intrepid-Class Lineage" noted that "The Aeroshuttle was the only upgraded component to the Intrepid-class that remained in the development cycle long after the other major systems had been frozen and released for fabrication and assembly."
"Based on the existing Starfleet runabout platform, the Aeroshuttle was given a 450 percent increase in atmospheric flight and hover endurance over standard shuttlecraft. This was accomplished through the use of hybrid microfusion and EM driven airflow coil engines."
"Although the Aeroshuttle spaceframe and basic systems were completed by Stardate 46875.3, final outfitting of mission-specific hardware was delayed until simulations and flight testing with the USS Intrepid could be completed."
She's a beaut.
Mr Berman thought it was nice, but didn't want to trump the captain's yacht launch sequence from the upcoming film Star Trek: Insurrection. As you remember that was a VERY dramatic, epic and cool launch sequence.
If you were a guy who hadn't gotten laid in two years then you'd be laying it on pretty thick too.And the "Angry Warrior Speech" is one of the most sickly sentimental pieces of drivel I've ever heard uttered on television.
At some point while writing a script which included a shuttle or torpedoes the writer should have said to themselves "Hmm, didn't we point out that we only had a limited number of these earlier in the series?" Then they should have said "Maybe I'll add in a line explaining where they come from." If not the writers then the script editor should have thought that, or the EP, or the director, or even the actors... someone along the line should have spotted that flaw in the episode and tried to correct it. If they didn't then it is the fault of all the people working on that episode and it is something which damages the reputation of the show, so the blame deserves to be placed on the episode.Praetorian said:GodBen, shouldn't the episodes be rated solely based on their merits, with the deductions of stars being apllied to a series wide rating? I mean taking out one full star from all the episodes after Season 3 (or whenever torpedoes and shuttles "end") because of an issue that "could be solved with a simple line" seems somewhat harsh...
Even the "this could have been done in TNG" issue strikes me as somewhat unfair, however at least is actually based on the episode in question....
I remember when I went to the Louvre in Paris, one of the first things I on the route was the Mona Lisa. There was a huge crowd surrounding it and taking photos and in order to see it I would have had to shove my way through the crowd as though I were in some form of rugby scrum. I decided to stand up on a bench instead and saw it over everyone's heads, but nobody could see it properly anyway because it was stored behind bulletproof glass.
I turned around to get off the bench and there was this magnificent painting in front of me. It was two stories high and took up almost the entire wall. It was of a battle scene, and in the sky had storm-clouds and angels, it was epic and it was ambitious and... only two other people were looking at it because everyone was huddled over the Mona Lisa.
That's the day when my faith in humanity began to fall, when I realised that people weren't interested in the ambitious yet flawed work of art, they were only there to see the famous painting and to snap a picture of it.
Sadly, I agree. I honestly don't think they ever bothered to ask Mr. Sternbach or the other members of the production department when addressing this kind of thing. All it takes is a casual glance at Voyager's hull to spot numerous minute details - from the offset spine airlock on the ship's back that uses the TNG cargo-bay-style doors, to a similar egress beside the shuttlebay egress.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.