scotthm said:
Of course. A person who can't think for themselves or get the job done isn't, and won't be a leader.Franklin said:
I watched an excellent special on The History Channel not long ago about the U.S. military academies. ...they aren't looking for mavericks or blantant rules violators, but they are looking for people who aren't afraid to think for themselves, assess a situation, and get the job done.
We already know about Kirk's cheating ways at Starfleet Academy. Can't we just have a movie that covers new territory?
Except his "cheating ways" got him a commendation for original thinking, not expulsion.
That's what we don't know about: How did he end up with that commendation instead of expulsion? Must've been one hell of defense. Or, as Sharr Khan intimated, the tribunal he was brought before was more or less perfunctory, and the brass themselves just wanted to scare him while they were actually in the back rooms laughing their asses off at how a young louie beat the no-win test.
Maybe they had to find out what kind of character Kirk truly was. OK, you "cheated" based on your personal principles. Are you willing to be punished for putting your principles ahead of regulations? Even if what you did was remarkable?
We see the same thing in TVH. Kirk stands before the Federation Council ready to accept whatever punishment they give him. Never mind, of course, in violating regulations and orders he brought Spock back to life and saved the world. Kirk stood ready to face his punishment.
And then there's McCoy's line in TUC after Kirk says that once again they've saved civilization: "And the best part is this time they're not pressing charges."