Actually, you could still be completely insane.Awesome, some people agree with me.
Now I know that I'm not completely insane.
A series should have a continuity person/fact checker. There are certainly enough of us out here with sufficient trivia knowledge and references that a production could hire one geek to sift through a script and say, for example, "The planet has been called 'Andor' in fanfic for 30 years, 'Andoria' sounds stupid. Please change."
Glaring continuity errors bewteen series take me out of the story. The Romulans being able to cloak in Enterprise, for example. It says to me "We're not paying attention to what's come before. History isn't important to us, and we don't care what you think."
Not sure this is a good example. Surely the Romulans could always cloak since their first appearance in Star Trek TOS, "Balance of Terror".
Glaring continuity errors bewteen series take me out of the story. The Romulans being able to cloak in Enterprise, for example. It says to me "We're not paying attention to what's come before. History isn't important to us, and we don't care what you think."
Not sure this is a good example. Surely the Romulans could always cloak since their first appearance in Star Trek TOS, "Balance of Terror".
Yes, they could cloak since TOS' Balance of Terror, where it came as a total surprise to Kirk and Spock. The Enterprise episode took place 100 years BEFORE Balance of Terror. Ya see the problem?
Anyhoo, that's just an example.
It's been a while since I've seen the episode but wasn't there a discussion between Kirk, Spock, and Stiles about how long its been (80 years?) since anyone has had contact with the Romulans and that no one has even seen a Romulan before (hence the surprise from the crew when the Romulan commander looks like a vulcan)?
I think they even said that the last contact was not only non-visual but was during a war that used atomic weapons. So ENT completely threw continuity/canon out the window. Personally I think that them contacting the Romulans at all is more egregious than the potentially early form of cloaking device.
...any sense of continuity is a tip of the hat to fans, and away of saying thank you for our life-long dedication to Trek.
Agreed. This is true of any TV show. Producers of television are basically asking viewers to make an investment in the show mentally/emotionally. You could be watching another show or doing something else completely but you choose to watch their production. Most writers seek to further that relationship by creating new storylines that build on what has already been established.
The difficulty with Trek is that after 5 separate series and 10 movies creativity has suffered. Plus throw in the fact that 3 out of those 5 series were basically produced by the same people. If you have to choose between canon and creativity, creativity should win out. A highly rated episode, that steps on the toes of canon, is better than an episode that follows canon to a whim and fails to attract viewers. But when you can bring the two together that makes for some great Trek.
I ,for one, am willing to forgo some canon if it will make the show/movie better.
^a daughter? Why not? Wasn't Kirk promiscuous?
By the way, current CBS Consumer Products' Paula Block was a fan from the early days of ST fandom. She's been in the job since the 80s.
There are times when turning away from continuity totally works for me:
ENT Andorians' antennae move!
The makeup/prosthetics for ENT Tellarites was a vast improvement.
Glaring continuity errors bewteen series take me out of the story. The Romulans being able to cloak in Enterprise, for example. It says to me "We're not paying attention to what's come before. History isn't important to us, and we don't care what you think."
Not sure this is a good example. Surely the Romulans could always cloak since their first appearance in Star Trek TOS, "Balance of Terror".
Yes, they could cloak since TOS' Balance of Terror, where it came as a total surprise to Kirk and Spock. The Enterprise episode took place 100 years BEFORE Balance of Terror. Ya see the problem?
Anyhoo, that's just an example.
And yes, that means Enterprise ignored the shit out of continuity, not only with the Romulans, but with the Suliban and their cloaking ability as well.
I've considered a solution to the contradiction re: atomic weapons in the E-R wars vs. the technology available in ENT. Earth only has the two warp 5 starships which are expensive and time-consuming to build. They're Star Fleet's best ships and it's unlikely Enterprise and Columbia would be Earth's first choices for cannon fodder. They would be used to pursue alliances, establish agreements for aid, weapons and technology and ferry materiel and ordnance to colonies at risk, etc.Not sure this is a good example. Surely the Romulans could always cloak since their first appearance in Star Trek TOS, "Balance of Terror".
Yes, they could cloak since TOS' Balance of Terror, where it came as a total surprise to Kirk and Spock. The Enterprise episode took place 100 years BEFORE Balance of Terror. Ya see the problem?
Anyhoo, that's just an example.
It's been a while since I've seen the episode but wasn't there a discussion between Kirk, Spock, and Stiles about how long its been (80 years?) since anyone has had contact with the Romulans and that no one has even seen a Romulan before (hence the surprise from the crew when the Romulan commander looks like a vulcan)?
I think they even said that the last contact was not only non-visual but was during a war that used atomic weapons. So ENT completely threw continuity/canon out the window. Personally I think that them contacting the Romulans at all is more egregious than the potentially early form of cloaking device.
Or maybe I just have my memory/time line mixed up.
Not sure this is a good example. Surely the Romulans could always cloak since their first appearance in Star Trek TOS, "Balance of Terror".
Yes, they could cloak since TOS' Balance of Terror, where it came as a total surprise to Kirk and Spock. The Enterprise episode took place 100 years BEFORE Balance of Terror. Ya see the problem?
Anyhoo, that's just an example.
Yes, I see your point. It's a while since I have seen "Balance of Terror" (least that's my excuse!), but of course ENT should not have had cloaking Romulans, or any idea of what Romulans looked like.Nothing but lazy, sloppy writing and production values.
Regards
... No-one thinks twice about expecting writers to write consistent and internally coherent stuff for shows like Law & Order or ER, and just because their 'canon' isn't about spaceships and aliens doesn't make it any different a concern.
Star Trek should be able to be creative and original, and maintain the consistency of the existing canon. Both. If the writers can't do this, get better writers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.