• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers A big hint about the finale/season 3 has dropped...

I'd actually approve of a soft reboot that eliminates all of the real world Earth dates but keeps all events the same. Date things from the founding of the Federation, which has no fixed Earth date. Star Trek 2 ran with the throwaway Eugenics War 1990s dates and made them the centerpiece of the entire franchise, which was a mistake and stopped making Star Trek "our" future.
I actually thought the Into Darkness would do that, but nope - which had to be confusing to some of the non-Trekkie general audience.
 
HarshInsignificantGuanaco-size_restricted.gif
"You never do!"
 
I actually thought the Into Darkness would do that, but nope - which had to be confusing to some of the non-Trekkie general audience.
The 2009 movie was also confusing to non-Trekkie general audiences! I took someone from China who knew nothing about Star Trek to see it with me, and she was completely confused.

JJ Abrams made a huge hype about how the 2009 film was for general audiences, but it wasn't.
 
JJ Abrams made a huge hype about how the 2009 film was for general audiences, but it wasn't.
That depends, to my mind. I know many who are nerds and many who are not familiar with Star Trek and they both thoroughly enjoyed 09. Even my mom, who detests SF, enjoyed it.

I'm sure stories like this could go back and forth for eternity but I could hardly say it wasn't for general audiences.
 
The 2009 movie was also confusing to non-Trekkie general audiences! I took someone from China who knew nothing about Star Trek to see it with me, and she was completely confused.

JJ Abrams made a huge hype about how the 2009 film was for general audiences, but it wasn't.


It was a great deal more so than any previous Trek.
 
That depends, to my mind. I know many who are nerds and many who are not familiar with Star Trek and they both thoroughly enjoyed 09. Even my mom, who detests SF, enjoyed it.

I'm sure stories like this could go back and forth for eternity but I could hardly say it wasn't for general audiences.
Considering I saw it with a literal general audience member and she was completely confused (another friend, also from China was confused but became less so upon my pointing her to the Countdown prequel comic)--well, there's a reason we have tests to test hypotheses.

I tested JJ's hypothesis that his film was understandable to general audience members with an actual general audience member, and the test failed. (And it wasn't a language issue, her English is excellent). Not sure how I can get more clear cut than that.
 
The 2009 movie was also confusing to non-Trekkie general audiences! I took someone from China who knew nothing about Star Trek to see it with me, and she was completely confused.

JJ Abrams made a huge hype about how the 2009 film was for general audiences, but it wasn't.

I can very safely say that wasn't the case. I know this because, in 2009, everyone I know was asking me what I thought about the movie because they know I'm a fan. It was the first time I ever thought, "Please stop asking me!" I came up with a canned response that I gave out on cue: "I thought it was great!" No one asked me about the plot. They seemed to be able to follow it just fine.
 
Considering I saw it with a literal general audience member and she was completely confused (another friend, also from China was confused but became less so upon my pointing her to the Countdown prequel comic)--well, there's a reason we have tests to test hypotheses.

I tested JJ's hypothesis that his film was understandable to general audience members with an actual general audience member, and the test failed. (And it wasn't a language issue, her English is excellent). Not sure how I can get more clear cut than that.
:shrug:
That my mom who is unfamiliar with Star Trek and my wife who is unfamiliar with Star Trek could watch it without issue...not sure what more general audience we want. :shrug:

Stating that it failed with a sample size of one is not exactly statistically significant.
 
I can very safely say that wasn't the case. I know this because, in 2009, everyone I know was asking me what I thought about the movie because they know I'm a fan. It was the first time I ever thought, "Please stop asking me!" I came up with a canned responses that I gave out on cue: "I thought it was great!" No one asked me about the plot. They seemed to be able to follow it just fine.
Keep in mind I am talking about non-Americans who don't even know who Spock is. That's what I mean by general audience. People who know nothing about Star Trek.

From that standpoint, older Spock showing up makes about as much sense as Sean Connery showing up in Casino Royale telling Daniel Craig that he's Bond from the future. This would mean nothing if you don't know anything about James Bond and Casino Royale is your first Bond work.
:shrug:
That my mom who is unfamiliar with Star Trek and my wife who is unfamiliar with Star Trek could watch it without issue...not sure what more general audience we want. :shrug:

Stating that it failed with a sample size of one is not exactly statistically significant.
Fair enough, and reportedly Star Trek Into Darkness was a big hit in China. Since that made even less sense than the 2009 movie to me...
 
See the link here:

Basically, inside sources involved with production have said the show will have a time jump. However, the time jump is not to the Calypso future 1,000 years hence, but "only" 500 years in the future - in the 28th century.

Edit: I still don't understand how to square this with Georgiou staying on the show - unless she becomes main cast for the third season, and this is just a one-season diversion. Maybe Section 31 still exists in the 28th century, and for some reason they decide to hire her?

I don't believe it.

Like, I totally believe there will be a time-jump in the finale, to 500 years in the future (or wherever Momma Burnham is right now). But it won't be permanent for the show - only a few characters will travel there and then back.

As for the big "game-changer", my money is on Momma Burnham returning and merging with "Control", sacrifice herself to save the universe, get thrown back into the past, and try to create "order" throughout the universe through different means (in the beginning allowing other beings to peaceful join, then become more agressive - the Borg).

That will have everything, big drama, sacrifice, Burnham's backstory "closed", and also will make her connected not just to Spock and the Klingon war, but also responsible for the Borg ravaging the galaxy.:rolleyes:
 
Keep in mind I am talking about non-Americans who don't even know who Spock is. That's what I mean by general audience. People who know nothing about Star Trek.

From that standpoint, older Spock showing up makes about as much sense as Sean Connery showing up in Casino Royale telling Daniel Craig that he's Bond from the future. This would mean nothing if you don't know anything about James Bond and Casino Royale is your first Bond work.

"Old Spock is from their future. In the future, people get old." That's all you have to say.
 
I actually thought the Into Darkness would do that, but nope - which had to be confusing to some of the non-Trekkie general audience.
If the audience could cope with Captain America not existing in their past, they could cope with Khan (who's basically an evil version of the same thing) in ID.
 
As for the big "game-changer", my money is on Momma Burnham returning and merging with "Control", sacrifice herself to save the universe, get thrown back into the past, and try to create "order" throughout the universe through different means (in the beginning allowing other beings to peaceful join, then become more agressive - the Borg).
I hope you didn't put too much money on it. :techman:
 
So here’s my “hot take” (ugh) opinion, apparently. I don’t want a Pike show. Anson is fantastic, yes, but if Pike is about to meet his grim fate then the show would be a prequel to the events of Discovery S2 and I’m just. Kinda. Done. With the prequel thing. ;_;

I wouldn't be bothered if Discovery ends after 3 seasons to be honest. It's Michael Burnham's story and we've seen most of it now. She's not that interesting a character to spend countless seasons on. As long as we get Georgiou's show I'm good. I wouldn't say no to Pike either. Both are far more engaging characters and I think their shows would likely be a lot more ensemble than Discovery. We're going to have more Trek than you can shake a stick at so it's inevitable some will be shorter lived than others.

Plenty fair, yeah. I disagree with one thing — I feel like the natural conclusion to Michael’s story is to see her become captain and, ideally, experience what that’s like for a season. In that sense I’m not sure we’re quite that close to the end of her story.

I agree that Pike and Georgiou are better, though.

All they have said is that S31 series goes into production after Discovery season 3. So obviously it will come after season 3. And a CBS executive made a general comment that some of the Trek shows in development (due to long production cycle) may become replacements of existing shows. This comment was not about any specific show, and I think you are connecting the dots incorrectly. Nothing is set in stone. There will be a Discovery season 3. Anything beyond that depends on how popular it is (as far as attracting subscribers) and how well CBS AA is doing.

Fair enough! Thanks for having a stronger memory, lol. That said, I can still see it happening. But maybe not. We’ll see!

As much as I love pointless geek debates, this does seem like bullshit.

Mercifully, we won’t have to wait much longer to find out.
 
If the audience could cope with Captain America not existing in their past, they could cope with Khan (who's basically an evil version of the same thing) in ID.
Captain America doesn't have magical healing blood... Did they even try to use any of that on Captain Pike?

Kirk: This hearing is now in session. Under the authority vested in me by Starfleet Command, I declare all charges and specifications in this matter have been dropped.

Spock: Allow me to take some blood samples of Khan and the Augments first. Then I will take leave to violate General Order 7. Again.
 
If the finale does reset/overwrite what has happened to date, I'll be very peeved. It would be an insult to fans of the series in an attempt to appease those who are not fans.

However, it's merely speculation at this point, and there's no use in getting worked up over mere speculation.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top