It reminded me, somewhat, of Sapphire & Steel as well.
...the "love story" bit at the end kind of killed it a little, why couldn't the monster have just been that? A malevolent monster the created the pocket universe to eat people or something? The boogeyman! It just felt sort of tacked on at the last minute.
I might be mis-remembering this but the only 'violent' action the creature takes is to save the Doctor from going over the cliff?
The idea that it is violent seems to exist purely in the head of the Doctor and the others, it is a being rather than a monster.
And while I understand those who'd prefer the monster be kept a monster, for me the revelation at the end was so nutty and inspired and off the wall that I couldn't help but love it anyway.![]()
Maybe I missed this - since the Time-Traveller couldn't go home did the Doctor simply leave her in 1974?
Maybe I missed this - since the Time-Traveller couldn't go home did the Doctor simply leave her in 1974?
There was no further reference to the fate of Hila Tacorian (the time-traveller) beyond the fact that she couldn't go home. The writer simply decided to leave it out, I suppose (much like the writer of "Cold War" never mentioned how the Doctor got to the South Pole)
I prefer this one, the monster in 1974 is kind of like a "ghost" in that one can only catch glimpses of it, and that certain conditions must be met for it to catch somebody.
- There is a single monster that can freely transport between the pocket universe and our world. But then why wouldn't it simply attack people in the house?
I thought it was a very good episode. I've always liked the "it looks like a supernatural phenomenon but it's really SCIENCE" stories, and this one was one of the better ones.
i had the same thought.When the Doctor said "Every monster needs a companion", was it me or did that feel like a reference towards the Doctor as much as the creature.
I had wondered about this as well. Maybe instead of throwing on that sappy "every monster needs a companion" ending (which itself didn't really end properly), they should have just ended the primary story correctly and told us the fate of Tacorian.Maybe I missed this - since the Time-Traveller couldn't go home did the Doctor simply leave her in 1974?
There was no further reference to the fate of Hila Tacorian (the time-traveller) beyond the fact that she couldn't go home. The writer simply decided to leave it out, I suppose (much like the writer of "Cold War" never mentioned how the Doctor got to the South Pole)
I think it was probably "The Crooked Man" listed in the credits, and yeah, it was well done with all its jittery movements & appearance. Very creepy and disturbing.publiusr said:The walking stick creature was well done.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.