We didn't have much defense from that position (pg) last season so my answer would have to be, probably not. I'm just hoping that Nash at least doesn't have trouble rotating on the perimeter which is -- something. I just hope Mike doesn't screw it up. He needs to back off and allow Kobe, Nash, and Pau, to work it out on the court.Since Mike Brown is supposed to be such a defensive minded coach, do you think he can tweak things to compensate with Nash's defensive shortcomings?
Although I am a diehard Lakers fan and very happy about the Nash trade, I understand your pain. I'm also a Raiders fan who went through what you're probably going through when Marcus Allen, one of my all time favorite football players, left the Raiders to sign with the Kansas City Cheifs (the only thing worse would have been the Denver Boncos).well i think i be takeing my Steve nash shirt to goodwill! he can go to Any team we want but why iy has to be La Laker lol
6ers essentially turned Iguadala into the second best center in the league and he is only 24.
The key for the Lakers is that we didn't have to give up anything other than Bynum, making it Bynum pretty much straight up for the best center in the league, as it should be. Giving up Pau too would have been too much for Dwight.
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, inconsistency was a problem here. But I think that a new environment, one in which he will have to prove himself, as well as continue to carry his own water, has a good chance of becoming a guy who gives a max effort every game. If he does that AND stays healthy, the sky's the limit. Right now Drew is the best center in the east.6ers essentially turned Iguadala into the second best center in the league and he is only 24.
Yeah. He's still inconsistent at times, but it's still great for them. The Sixers have a ton of mid-sized guard/small forwards like Iguodala but need a good big man. Elton Brand never worked out for them, so hopefully Bynum will stay the Bynum of LA.
I know that Pau was originally a part of the deal, but I don't know that he was ever "offered". That does not sound like something the Lakers would have done unless they were desperate -- and they weren't.The key for the Lakers is that we didn't have to give up anything other than Bynum, making it Bynum pretty much straight up for the best center in the league, as it should be. Giving up Pau too would have been too much for Dwight.
It's a great deal because they essentially upgrade at a position at no cost. But that's not how it normally is. Pau is aging and has a big contract. He actually was offered as part of this deal, but Orlando turned him down.
Pau's contract isn't a problem. His production should increase with the addition of Nash and now Dwight. Besides, just because Orl didn't want him means nothing. Those doofuses also didn't want Drew and appear right now to have gone from the driver's seat to the loser's seat among the 4 involved teams.
BTW, the trade is now officially complete having been cleared by the league.
So, let me be the mature one here and say, SUCK it Dan Gilbert, SUCK it Marc Cuban, SUCK it David Stern.
Not really a matter of being able to afford it, it just would not have been justified. Dwight's the best center in the league but we already had a pretty good one in Bynum. As good as he is, Dwight isn't enough of an upgrade over Bynum to be worth both Drew and Pau.They have Nash and Bryant. With Howard, that would have been a great deal even without Gasol. Obviously, the Lakers are happy to take a deal without giving up Gasol, but if any team could afford to overpay for the best center in the league, it would be the Lakers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.