So that’s why Han doesn’t shoot first anymore. To show a new ho…nope. Can’t even. (Does anyone still say that?) Wait…what’s going on?Yeah. Wasn't on the print I saw.
So that’s why Han doesn’t shoot first anymore. To show a new ho…nope. Can’t even. (Does anyone still say that?) Wait…what’s going on?Yeah. Wasn't on the print I saw.
who has, say it with me, "never seen Star Wars"To show a new ho…
If I were to argue anything at all, it's that "Star Trek (2009)" is the de facto title/subtitle, by virtue of having been in continuous use for 15-plus years. Just say that much, and everyone already knows which movie you're talking about.Ideally, the subtitle would make some statement about the plot. Unless, of course, you argue that "(2009)" is a statement in itself

Don’t you mean Star Trek Leading Zero?Star Trek Zero![]()

just call it ST 11, maybe.

Slacker. Mine is 47,000 pages long.That's what I do. Well, I type STXI.
As for why I prefer that to ST09, well, I have a 47,000 word manifesto, all ready to go...!![]()
![]()

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.