well, watch out Nerdius, she might deck you next!
i vote Stephanie Brown.
i vote Stephanie Brown.
16 year-old girl tackles a robber and slams him to the ground!
- Thread starter Flying Spaghetti Monster
- Start date
Angela 0077
Captain
Looks like this cheerleader could save herself.
Alternately, should we cast her as Stephanie Brown, Kara Zor-El, Cassie Sandsmark, or Courtney Whitmore?
Kind of rude to imply a 16-yo has fake boobs, don't you think?
Well alot of teenagers and adult women are getting the boob job these days even going to the point of having plastic surgery.
In the avent of improving themselves and wanting to be accepted in there peer groups
I have seena few programs on this.
Maybe she hasnt had the boob job.
I am also not being rude l was just making a statement.
Have you heard of the term freedom of speech.
Which applies to governments and persons acting on the behalf of government, not individuals.
Also, even if it did it'd be his freedom of speech to speak against you.
Say what?
A rude statement, by anyone's standards.
The moderators of a corporate or privately owned forum aren't obliged to allow people to post anything they want to post. Civil rights codes might apply if their thread locking or moderator activities vary depending on the member's gender or race. Discrimination on the basis of age might be permitted where some sexual topics are permisable. Arguments about the forum owner's right to freely practice their religion would probably have more strength than the member's choices. It's pretty similar to a newspaper's "Letters to the Editor" page.
Services like telephones and ISPs are allowed less control over user generated content, and a degree of immunity about any indecency or intellectual rights problems.
Members would have more freedom on any government operated forums that operate in the US.
Services like telephones and ISPs are allowed less control over user generated content, and a degree of immunity about any indecency or intellectual rights problems.
Members would have more freedom on any government operated forums that operate in the US.
You making a rude comment = freedom of speech.
People telling you it was a rude comment = freedom of speech.
I don't see any higher moral or legal ground for you, Angela.
That was last decade. Now they just smooch them.
Say what?
Eh, I got it backwards. What I meant to say that Amendment applies to government in terms of what they can and cannot do. Government cannot abridge the freedom to speech. However an individual, or a business, can.
As if I didn't need more help feeling old and out of touch.
J
Jetfire
Guest
Angela 0077
Captain
Angela 0077
Captain
Say what?
Eh, I got it backwards. What I meant to say that Amendment applies to government in terms of what they can and cannot do. Government cannot abridge the freedom to speech. However an individual, or a business, can.
Yes l agree with you there that the goverment can do things to a certain point but they need support from the rest of the goverment to be able to pass a certain admendment through or even to be able to talk about it .
Simlar to Primeminster Rudd losing his job as our leader and Julia Gilard taking over she was able to get support to be voted in.
What l am saying is that you should be able to have a opinion on things to a certain point.
It is great to be able to get across two side not just one.
Olivia Munn has that under control.
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_PY405f40[/yt]
Olivia Munn has that under control.
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_PY405f40[/yt]
Who knew vampires had so much blood in them? I thought that was, you know, kind-of the point of them having to drink blood and stuff.
Similar threads
