“Mirror, Mirror”: “In every revolution…

[FredH]

“…there’s one man with a vision.”

But wait a minute: that sounds great, but it just isn’t so, is it?

No single person started, or even led (for very long) the French Revolution. The American Revolution certainly wasn’t just a pet project of George Washington’s. Lenin had to come back to Russia to try to wrap the Russian Revolution around himself.

Thoughts?

 

[ZapBrannigan]

Kirk: "Don't call me on this sh--. I'm trying to get a point across!"

He meant there has to be at least one man (this was 1967). He meant nothing will budge without Spock becoming the first man to move the ball forward.

 

[Metryq]

Wyoming dear lady, revolutions are not won by enlisting the masses. Revolution is a science only a few are competent to practice.
—Prof. Bernardo de la Paz, The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein

My point is that one person is responsible. Always. If H-bombs exist—and they do—some man controls them. In terms of morals there is no such thing as 'state.' Just men. Individuals. Each responsible for his own acts.
—Prof. Bernardo de la Paz, The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein

The man with the vision may not be the "leader" of the actions. And revolutions are not limited to politics. In science, many may be exploring the same field. Many times in science the "revolutionary" may be a complete novice, not a career scientist or researcher. But they come up with an idea or new way of looking at things that they up-end the establishment.

 

[Rowdy Roddy McDowall]

Captain, GET IN THE CHAMBER!!!!