WarDilmore
Sounds like a digimon. Kevin WarDilmore is the mega form of Kevin Dilmore.

WarDilmore
It(?) even has its own Twitter account. https://twitter.com/wardilmoreWarDilmore
Sounds like a digimon. Kevin WarDilmore is the mega form of Kevin Dilmore.![]()
It(?) even has its own Twitter account. https://twitter.com/wardilmoreWarDilmore
Sounds like a digimon. Kevin WarDilmore is the mega form of Kevin Dilmore.![]()
![]()
Back when David Mack and Wardimore first started talking about the series, they said this first one was going to be a two parter, but that most of the rest of the books would be one and done. I don't think they ruled out doing more two parters, but I believe the vast majority will be one and done. I could be mistaken though, and if I am I'm sure one of the writers will be along to correct me shortly.I wasn't expecting the connections to Vanguard, or that it wasn't a one-and-done plot. The series may be more about exploration like TOS was, but it doesn't seem like planet-of-the-week is necessarily how things will be going.
Overall I enjoyed it and am looking forward to next month's book.![]()
This is all essentially correct.Back when David Mack and Wardimore first started talking about the series, they said this first one was going to be a two parter, but that most of the rest of the books would be one and done. I don't think they ruled out doing more two parters, but I believe the vast majority will be one and done. I could be mistaken though, and if I am I'm sure one of the writers will be along to correct me shortly.
First, WGA rules have no bearing on writing credits in novels.EDIT: I do have one question, though. The story credit on the title page (as well as for some of the Vanguard novels, although in different order) was "story by David Mack and Dayton Ward & Kevin Dilmore". Based on how the WGA does crediting, if this were a screenplay that would mean that Dayton & Kevin worked together to rewrite David's story. Is that actually a fair assessment of the process? Or was it a collaborative effort, with and/& being chosen to separate out the Wardilmore writing team rather than indicating a rewrite?
I think they put that in there to denote the fact that Seekers #1 and Seekers #2 are a two-part story. David Mack wrote the first, while WarDilmore wrote book #2, but they came up with the overall story together as a team. In fact...they came up with the entire Seekers concept together as a team.
The "&" in "Dayton Ward & Kevin Dilmore" is used because they worked on their story as one unit, much like they did for 2 of the Vanguard books. I don't think it's about a re-write situation.
I could be wrong though. Hopefully David comes by and lets us know![]()
There are no plans for that, but anything could happen.Will there be a diagram of the ship in any of the books? Always love those.
No.Since I'm on the subject, is there a diagram of the Aventine in any of the novels?
Well, yes, but they're the only such formal rules that I'm familiar withFirst, WGA rules have no bearing on writing credits in novels.![]()
And that's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for the information!And that's all there is to say about that.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.