First, I disagree with your characterization of Reyes and T'Prynn.Are there any villains in the Starfleet crew this time, like Reyes and T'Prynn in Vanguard? Or does the crew fit the more TOS-ian tone?
Whereas Vanguard was described by many as “Star Trek meets the new Battlestar Galactica,” Seekers represents a return to the more classic style of Star Trek adventure: “strange new worlds, and new life-forms.”
I'm aware that my opinion on their destruction of Pennington's life is a bit stronger than most.First, I disagree with your characterization of Reyes and T'Prynn.Are there any villains in the Starfleet crew this time, like Reyes and T'Prynn in Vanguard? Or does the crew fit the more TOS-ian tone?
I knew that was the goal, as I alluded to. But while that speaks to plot and overall tone, that doesn't necessarily define the cast.Second, I direct you to last year's announcement of the new series on my blog — in particular, this statement:
Whereas Vanguard was described by many as “Star Trek meets the new Battlestar Galactica,” Seekers represents a return to the more classic style of Star Trek adventure: “strange new worlds, and new life-forms.”
His life? Hardly. They introduced some unfair disgrace into his career. But the damage to his personal life was self-inflicted.I'm aware that my opinion on their destruction of Pennington's life is a bit stronger than most.First, I disagree with your characterization of Reyes and T'Prynn.Are there any villains in the Starfleet crew this time, like Reyes and T'Prynn in Vanguard? Or does the crew fit the more TOS-ian tone?
Much as I'm not a massive fan of Christopher L. Bennett's writing, the scenes on the planet could have probably been well served by some of his world and society building. The Tomol were only thinly sketched - most of what we learnt about them was told and not shown - and we still don't really get a good feel of them.
Agreed on the damage to his personal life being self-inflicted. But even if you rebuild your house after it's destroyed by a tornado, even if it's bigger and better than it was before, it was still destroyed by a tornado and you were still homeless for a while.His life? Hardly. They introduced some unfair disgrace into his career. But the damage to his personal life was self-inflicted.I'm aware that my opinion on their destruction of Pennington's life is a bit stronger than most.
As was depicted in the middle and later Vanguard novels, Tim Pennington's career rebounded quite adroitly. Furthermore, judging by the fact that he later established a school of journalism that by the 24th century was regarded as a paragon in its field, it might be safe to say that any harm to his personal or professional fortunes was short-lived and later only added to his notoriety.
EDIT: I do have one question, though. The story credit on the title page (as well as for some of the Vanguard novels, although in different order) was "story by David Mack and Dayton Ward & Kevin Dilmore". Based on how the WGA does crediting, if this were a screenplay that would mean that Dayton & Kevin worked together to rewrite David's story. Is that actually a fair assessment of the process? Or was it a collaborative effort, with and/& being chosen to separate out the Wardilmore writing team rather than indicating a rewrite?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.