• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Can Conservative Star Trek Fans Exist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, I know plenty of Star Trek fans that would identify as conservative.
They can and do exist.
 
I personally am a moderate liberal, but one of my best friends in college was a libertarian, and just as Trekkie as me. His commentary: "Star Trek shows what the Navy would be like if it were run by Commies." :)
 
As a devout Roman Catholic and staunch Republican, myself, one could most certainly count 2takesfrakes amongst Conservative STAR TREK Fans.

It would appear we have much in common as I could not have described myself any better.

Cheers!
 
^The point being that the Borg could just as easily be seen as a metaphor for single-minded conservatism. Or militarism. Or consumerism (which I believe was the original intent).
We can see a lot of "ism" in the Borg. First of all, there's the totalitarianism:
1- The absolute elimination of individuality, as both tried by fascist and communist regimes.
2- The absolute dogmatism.
3- The "New Man".
4- The utopia (and the destructive way of building it)
 
I voted for Romney.I agree that the Trek 'ideal' leans left, but one of Trek's biggest themes is keeping an open mind.
 
I know this sounds pessimistic, but I prefer to assume that none of my own personal views will ever be reflected in Trek (or any other show or film). That way, logically speaking I will always be either 1) right, or 2) pleasantly surprised. Think about it... ;)

The collective is enslaving the individual(which also backs up earlier points made comparing the Borg to an extreme example of Marxism.) As for intent, The collective wants to better themselves by adding man power, technology and resources.

But when somebody is assimilated, they're not slaves to the Borg - they ARE Borg. The Borg don't enslave other races to make them serve the collective - they make them part of it. You can't be a slave to something that you are a part of.

And the Queen is only a representative of the collective - she is empowered to speak for them, but she doesn't control them. The Borg control themselves, in a way. This doesn't make them any less terrifying, of course, but the distinction is there.
 
Maybe, but really, I expected better from the Tories this time.
The ministers who compose the Tories do change over time, hope springs eternal.


True, whilst many of us might be somewhat jaded, cynical belief politicians of all parties are in for themselves. It still doesn't prevent us from going to the polls to cast our vote in the hope that this time will be different.
 
^The point being that the Borg could just as easily be seen as a metaphor for single-minded conservatism. Or militarism. Or consumerism (which I believe was the original intent).
We can see a lot of "ism" in the Borg. First of all, there's the totalitarianism:
1- The absolute elimination of individuality, as both tried by fascist and communist regimes.
2- The absolute dogmatism.
3- The "New Man".
4- The utopia (and the destructive way of building it)

I believe it's Q that describes the Borg as the 'ultimate consumers'. Not a stretch there.
 
Yeah that sounds right...I was drawing a blank, looked up the exact quote briefly and got something like the 'ultimate hunger'. I knew I wasn't exactly right, but it doesn't change the sentiment.

CC, please feel free to further explain your computer user interpretation, I'd like to hear it.
 
There is room in Star Trek fandom for any form of political beliefs. There is no room for treating people badly because their political beliefs are different from your own.

Amen! That is exactly how I feel. Most people think if they hide how they treat someone or a segment of people behind political beliefs, they are safe to say what they want. Denying rights to people based on "it's always been this way" is a poor excuse.

On the other end of political correctness, just because you cloak yourself in good words, but bad deeds for those people, does not mean you get a free pass.

We are, in my opinion, defined by how we treated our fellow man. Were we kind when we could've been crass? Did we listen to their concerns and try and see from their perspective, even if we disagree with them? When they were tired or hungry, without a home or a place to emotionally rest, did we offer ourselves as comfort? The rest, well, the rest is just vanity.
 
For the record, I am left of center, but my political leanings really depend on the issue at hand. The very idea that only leftists can possibly enjoy Star Trek is absurd, and I find this implication insulting to some conservative fans of Star Trek friends of mine. I think it is ridiculous to even bring politics of fans into Star Trek. TV and movies like Star Trek are the one place where one can get away from the real world, and escape the mundane bickerings of religion and politics and just the general shitty things of life, and where Star trek fans can share something in common without the trappings of who is left or right or what their religious or political affiliation is, or having to worry about getting into an argument over who one voted for in the last election.

For the record, I am right of center (although not very far) and I agree with this completely.
 
CC, please feel free to further explain your computer user interpretation, I'd like to hear it.

Any discussion of that has to be prefaced by the understanding that over the span of at least TNG plus STVIII:FC, the nature of the Borg was a moving target. Memory Alpha explains:

While it is not explicitly stated in "Q Who", Q implies that the sole interest of the Borg is in the technology of the USS Enterprise-D, and the Borg show no interest in that episode in the crew (although the segment of hull the Borg remove from the ship apparently contained several crew members). In their next appearance, "The Best of Both Worlds", this changed premise was referenced in dialog that the Borg's objectives had changed to assimilation of lifeforms. Subsequent episodes ignored the changed premise entirely.

Through the course of Star Trek history, further retroactive continuity changes appear to have been made in respect of the Borg. As of "Q Who" and "The Best of Both Worlds", it appeared that Starfleet had never heard of the Borg. Subsequently, Star Trek: Enterprise's "Regeneration" and Star Trek: Voyager's "Dark Frontier" showed that not only was Starfleet previously aware of the existence of the Borg, Federation scientists actually pursued them – even if they were considered mere rumor. Further, although Guinan indicates in "Q Who" that her people were attacked by the Borg, it is implied that Starfleet was not aware of the threat. However, it was later revealed in Star Trek Generations that Starfleet, in fact, rescued the El-Aurian survivors of the Borg attack including Guinan, and it seems unlikely that Starfleet would not inquire as to the cause of their plight.

[...]

The existence of the Borg Queen was a controversial change made to the Borg during the writing of Star Trek: First Contact. While the writers had intended to stay true to the original concept of the Borg as a collective hive, they found it difficult to maintain the dramatic impact of villains without a central face. Thus, they created the Queen. In the film, she claimed to have been present during the events of "The Best of Both Worlds", which in retrospect would appear to have negated the reason for Picard's assimilation in that episode (it was claimed that the Borg needed a single representative to speak for them). [etc.]

There are thus two significant contexts in which to interpret Q's assertion in "Q Who" that, "The Borg is the ultimate user": 1) as they were conceived at the time of "Q Who" and 2) as they were ultimately conceived after all retcons had been applied by the writers. The full line of Q's is:

Q: The Borg is the ultimate user. They're unlike any threat your Federation has ever faced. They're not interested in political conquest, wealth or power as you know it. They're simply interested in your ship, its technology. They've identified it as something they can consume.

1. The suggestion in "Q Who" would seem to be that, as initially conceived, the Borg were simply a single species that acquires technology and adapts it to their own purposes. My reading of "ultimate user" is simply that their technology is organized as a fully integrated computer network to which individual Borg are cybernetically connected as cyborgs. In this conception, they are not utterly ruled by the collective to the degree that they are later. Rather, the individuals each contribute decisions towards the whole collective action. At this stage of their conception, the ultimate supremacy of the organic over the cybernetic is implied by the application of the term user to the Borg. (Q's dialog is expository, so we should assume that what he tells us, by way of telling Picard, is true.) This interpretation is further reinforced by the discovery of infant Borg.

2. But by the time the Queen is invented, the interpretation of #1 is out the window and retconned away. Individual Borg can no longer really be thought of as users. Instead, they are victims, by way of assimilation. They do not wield their technology, but rather they are wielded by it. Their technology is less like a computer appliance that they use and more like a computer virus that has run amok and enslaved them.

Although it's possible that the Queen is running the show (indeed, the Queen is the only possibility of a master among the Borg humanoids, at least that we are aware of), they are, frankly, ultimately vague on the details of Borg hive organization. Therefore, a different admissible possibility would be that even the Queen is but a cog in the machine, and there is no organic master at all. This is certainly more in line with the original interpretation back during "Q Who", and, if you'll pardon the pun, would seem to represent the best of both worlds offered by the original queen-less view of the Borg and by the view with the Queen as a dramatic focus. Memory Alpha continues:

Still another explanation is that the Borg were in possession of innumerable copies of the Borg Queen and that the superficial death of one version simply resulted in the activation in a similar version to take her place in a similar fashion to the Vorta. The latter theory was corroborated by Rick Berman in an interview in Star Trek: Communicator. (Star Trek Communicator, issue 121)
Anyway, IMO, the bottom line is that, after all the retcons, Q's line about the Borg as "ultimate user" doesn't make as much sense as it might have originally. YMMV.
 
CorporalCaptain said:
Any discussion of that has to be prefaced by the understanding that over the span of at least TNG plus STVIII:FC, the nature of the Borg was a moving target.

I have a "limited" understanding of both....limited in the sense that I don't have every line memorized and signed cast photos on my walls.

Maybe I'm way off the mark, but I thought the "ultimate user" line (thanks for the correction) was a direct reference to the fact that they still process what they don't assimilate. Those guys stripped planets of everything in order to have the raw materials to make new ships and drones for the purpose of stripping more planets, to make more drones and ships, on and on in an never-ending circle.
 
The actual phrase is "ultimate user" in "Q Who", which I always assumed was in the sense of computer user.
Like in the movie Tron?

My take, based on all I've seen of the Borg in different episodes, is that the Borg are "users" as the opposite of "producers," the Borg don't create anything, they have no original thoughts, they contribute nothing. They travel about the galaxy assimilating the knowledge and works of others.

The Borg are "users."

Q's dialog is expository, so we should assume that what he tells us, by way of telling Picard, is true.
I alway assume that little that comes out of Q mouth is strictly speaking "true." That he is twisting the facts, leaving something important out, and just generally screwing with the minds of whoever he speaking to at any given time.

But when somebody is assimilated, they're not slaves to the Borg - they ARE Borg. The Borg don't enslave other races to make them serve the collective - they make them part of it. You can't be a slave to something that you are a part of.
But the drones aren't "part" of the collective in so far as they have no personal input into it, if the collective controlled the collective the first thing they would do Mr. Laser Beam is free themselves.

They certainly do not seem to possess the ability to free themselves. They're not part of the collective, they are it's captives. It's slaves.

The Borg control themselves, in a way.
I disagree, YMMV.

And the Queen is only a representative of the collective - she is empowered to speak for them, but she doesn't control them.
We've seen the queens do things that are acts of pure ego, they control the collective as they see fit. The queens pull information from the brains of the drones and use the drones to perform tasks.

From First Contact.

DATA: Who are you?
BORG QUEEN : I am the Borg.
DATA: ... do you control the Borg collective?
BORG QUEEN: I am the collective.

Seven would occasional say "I am Borg."
But she never said "I am the Borg."

:)
 
T'Girl said:
...the Borg are "users" as the opposite of "producers"...

I fully agree with all of that except your first point, the Borg produce tons of stuff. Exponential kilotons. However, it's only to the benefit of the Borg and their insatiable instinct to expand to an unknown end. That's what makes them users/consumers.

So I do agree with you, guess I would just word it differently! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top