"PC vs. anti-PC."![]()
Ugh, Justin Long is all the more reason to avoid the PC/non-PC debate!

"PC vs. anti-PC."![]()
As a devout Roman Catholic and staunch Republican, myself, one could most certainly count 2takesfrakes amongst Conservative STAR TREK Fans.
We can see a lot of "ism" in the Borg. First of all, there's the totalitarianism:^The point being that the Borg could just as easily be seen as a metaphor for single-minded conservatism. Or militarism. Or consumerism (which I believe was the original intent).
The collective is enslaving the individual(which also backs up earlier points made comparing the Borg to an extreme example of Marxism.) As for intent, The collective wants to better themselves by adding man power, technology and resources.
The ministers who compose the Tories do change over time, hope springs eternal.Maybe, but really, I expected better from the Tories this time.
Outstanding! Indeed we do, sir!As a devout Roman Catholic and staunch Republican, myself, one could most certainly count 2takesfrakes amongst Conservative STAR TREK Fans.
It would appear we have much in common as I could not have described myself any better.
Cheers!
We can see a lot of "ism" in the Borg. First of all, there's the totalitarianism:^The point being that the Borg could just as easily be seen as a metaphor for single-minded conservatism. Or militarism. Or consumerism (which I believe was the original intent).
1- The absolute elimination of individuality, as both tried by fascist and communist regimes.
2- The absolute dogmatism.
3- The "New Man".
4- The utopia (and the destructive way of building it)
I believe it's Q that describes the Borg as the 'ultimate consumers'. Not a stretch there.
There is room in Star Trek fandom for any form of political beliefs. There is no room for treating people badly because their political beliefs are different from your own.
For the record, I am left of center, but my political leanings really depend on the issue at hand. The very idea that only leftists can possibly enjoy Star Trek is absurd, and I find this implication insulting to some conservative fans of Star Trek friends of mine. I think it is ridiculous to even bring politics of fans into Star Trek. TV and movies like Star Trek are the one place where one can get away from the real world, and escape the mundane bickerings of religion and politics and just the general shitty things of life, and where Star trek fans can share something in common without the trappings of who is left or right or what their religious or political affiliation is, or having to worry about getting into an argument over who one voted for in the last election.
CC, please feel free to further explain your computer user interpretation, I'd like to hear it.
While it is not explicitly stated in "Q Who", Q implies that the sole interest of the Borg is in the technology of the USS Enterprise-D, and the Borg show no interest in that episode in the crew (although the segment of hull the Borg remove from the ship apparently contained several crew members). In their next appearance, "The Best of Both Worlds", this changed premise was referenced in dialog that the Borg's objectives had changed to assimilation of lifeforms. Subsequent episodes ignored the changed premise entirely.
Through the course of Star Trek history, further retroactive continuity changes appear to have been made in respect of the Borg. As of "Q Who" and "The Best of Both Worlds", it appeared that Starfleet had never heard of the Borg. Subsequently, Star Trek: Enterprise's "Regeneration" and Star Trek: Voyager's "Dark Frontier" showed that not only was Starfleet previously aware of the existence of the Borg, Federation scientists actually pursued them – even if they were considered mere rumor. Further, although Guinan indicates in "Q Who" that her people were attacked by the Borg, it is implied that Starfleet was not aware of the threat. However, it was later revealed in Star Trek Generations that Starfleet, in fact, rescued the El-Aurian survivors of the Borg attack including Guinan, and it seems unlikely that Starfleet would not inquire as to the cause of their plight.
[...]
The existence of the Borg Queen was a controversial change made to the Borg during the writing of Star Trek: First Contact. While the writers had intended to stay true to the original concept of the Borg as a collective hive, they found it difficult to maintain the dramatic impact of villains without a central face. Thus, they created the Queen. In the film, she claimed to have been present during the events of "The Best of Both Worlds", which in retrospect would appear to have negated the reason for Picard's assimilation in that episode (it was claimed that the Borg needed a single representative to speak for them). [etc.]
Q: The Borg is the ultimate user. They're unlike any threat your Federation has ever faced. They're not interested in political conquest, wealth or power as you know it. They're simply interested in your ship, its technology. They've identified it as something they can consume.
Anyway, IMO, the bottom line is that, after all the retcons, Q's line about the Borg as "ultimate user" doesn't make as much sense as it might have originally. YMMV.Still another explanation is that the Borg were in possession of innumerable copies of the Borg Queen and that the superficial death of one version simply resulted in the activation in a similar version to take her place in a similar fashion to the Vorta. The latter theory was corroborated by Rick Berman in an interview in Star Trek: Communicator. (Star Trek Communicator, issue 121)
CorporalCaptain said:Any discussion of that has to be prefaced by the understanding that over the span of at least TNG plus STVIII:FC, the nature of the Borg was a moving target.
Like in the movie Tron?The actual phrase is "ultimate user" in "Q Who", which I always assumed was in the sense of computer user.
I alway assume that little that comes out of Q mouth is strictly speaking "true." That he is twisting the facts, leaving something important out, and just generally screwing with the minds of whoever he speaking to at any given time.Q's dialog is expository, so we should assume that what he tells us, by way of telling Picard, is true.
But the drones aren't "part" of the collective in so far as they have no personal input into it, if the collective controlled the collective the first thing they would do Mr. Laser Beam is free themselves.But when somebody is assimilated, they're not slaves to the Borg - they ARE Borg. The Borg don't enslave other races to make them serve the collective - they make them part of it. You can't be a slave to something that you are a part of.
I disagree, YMMV.The Borg control themselves, in a way.
We've seen the queens do things that are acts of pure ego, they control the collective as they see fit. The queens pull information from the brains of the drones and use the drones to perform tasks.And the Queen is only a representative of the collective - she is empowered to speak for them, but she doesn't control them.
T'Girl said:...the Borg are "users" as the opposite of "producers"...
That's not just in the UK. All parties everywhere are incompetent
Maybe, but really, I expected better from the Tories this time.
The ministers who compose the Tories do change over time, hope springs eternal.Maybe, but really, I expected better from the Tories this time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.