^That is the best post I ever read.![]()
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
Not to me. Above-it-all, pseudo-learned posts like that take all the fun out of threads like this for me.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
I've seen it! I've seen it! I've seen it!
It's good.
There are plenty of films that I enjoy from start to finish, but a "perfect" film? No such thing exists. It's too complicated an art form made by too many people for such a thing. And I wouldn't have it any other way.
"The perfect film" is my nickname for Raiders of the Lost Ark.
That's usually my fallback, along with Alien, Ghostbusters and especially Jurassic Park.
The only movies I can think of offhand where no obvious blemishes come to mind are:
Young Frankenstein
Casablanca
Steamboat Bill Jr.
Lawrence of Arabia
But the flashback gives us more screen time with Ingrid Bergman. And that automatically makes it essential.The only movies I can think of offhand where no obvious blemishes come to mind are:
Young Frankenstein
Casablanca
Steamboat Bill Jr.
Lawrence of Arabia
At the risk of sacrilege, I'm not sure the Paris flashback in Casablanca is necessary. Rick's reaction to Ilsa's return pretty much tells you everything you need to know about their history. I'm not sure we need a lengthy flashback to spell it out for us--while we're waiting impatiently to get back to Casablanca and the crisis at hand.
But otherwise, yeah, practically a perfect film.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
Mullholland Drive. If you haven't seen it, WATCH IT.
I've seen it! I've seen it! I've seen it!
It's good.
I haven't. I think I caught the first 10-20 minutes on TV once before falling asleep. Not because it was boring, it was just very late. Still I can't really remember it really grabbing me either.
I've heard people rave about it before so I'm curious what all the fuss is about?
But the flashback gives us more screen time with Ingrid Bergman. And that automatically makes it essential.The only movies I can think of offhand where no obvious blemishes come to mind are:
Young Frankenstein
Casablanca
Steamboat Bill Jr.
Lawrence of Arabia
At the risk of sacrilege, I'm not sure the Paris flashback in Casablanca is necessary. Rick's reaction to Ilsa's return pretty much tells you everything you need to know about their history. I'm not sure we need a lengthy flashback to spell it out for us--while we're waiting impatiently to get back to Casablanca and the crisis at hand.
But otherwise, yeah, practically a perfect film.![]()
After 20 or so viewings, I watch mainly to look at Ingrid. Doesn't everybody?But the flashback gives us more screen time with Ingrid Bergman. And that automatically makes it essential.At the risk of sacrilege, I'm not sure the Paris flashback in Casablanca is necessary. Rick's reaction to Ilsa's return pretty much tells you everything you need to know about their history. I'm not sure we need a lengthy flashback to spell it out for us--while we're waiting impatiently to get back to Casablanca and the crisis at hand.
But otherwise, yeah, practically a perfect film.![]()
But nobody watches Casablanca because they want to see a happy couple in love in Paris. We want the drama of Rick and Ilsa in Casablanca, after she comes back into his life . . .. .
I've seen it! I've seen it! I've seen it!
It's good.
I haven't. I think I caught the first 10-20 minutes on TV once before falling asleep. Not because it was boring, it was just very late. Still I can't really remember it really grabbing me either.
I've heard people rave about it before so I'm curious what all the fuss is about?
When you do watch it, make sure you double the length of the movie when planning time--you need to watch it twice to understand it. This is a good thing--I love David Lynch films.
After 20 or so viewings, I watch mainly to look at Ingrid. Doesn't everybody?But the flashback gives us more screen time with Ingrid Bergman. And that automatically makes it essential.![]()
But nobody watches Casablanca because they want to see a happy couple in love in Paris. We want the drama of Rick and Ilsa in Casablanca, after she comes back into his life . . .. .![]()
Nah, we watch for Claude Rains and Peter Lorre.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.