Working on STTNG

I think I'll need to come back and see/read the rest of this fascinating thread later. Right now, I can't get rid of the idea of seeing Marina Sirtis nude in person back then.

 

This story sounds dubious, since there was no reason for Marina or Majel to be fully naked; they were being filmed specifically in medium close up. The only shots requiring partial nudity would be the reverse angle where body doubles were likely substituted.

Of course, one way of confirming or disproving this claim is to ask someone at CBS Digital who has seen the 35mm full camera aperture shots of these scenes. It may be possible to see that Marina and Majel are in fact wearing something below the TV frame as I suspect they are.

 

That anecdote makes no sense. You'd think they'd at least be wearing underwear and pasties.

In Cost of Living, there's too much frame (SD and HD, I believe), and you can tell that Majel is wearing a flesh-colored top in that one.

 

Also, I can't imagine why the Rura Penthe sets would be up one full year before filming. Ménage à Troi aired in May of 1990, and photography didn't start on Star Trek VI until April 1991.

 

He didn't explicitly say that the Rura Penthe sets were standing at that point, only that they had been built on that stage (and my guess is they used the existing faux landscape for much of it).

 

Most of the ideas of tolerance that Trek espouses are just jokes to most of you aren't they?

 

No, they are not.
But what's the connection to this thread?

 

If it's going into the trash - absolutely. I don't think any self-respecting artist in any field would be OK with that. I'm just a cook, and I know what I make will eventually turn into poop anyway, but throwing away a dish I've worked hard on hurts a little inside. I can only imagine what it feels like if you're someone that makes things that are more permanent.

 

Weren't most if not all of the rure penthe interior sets actually shot out of doors at night at Vasquez Rocks? I remember AMERICAN CINEMATOGRAPHER had a still of the setup, and other mags talking about the rough cold night shoots.

 

Delancie claimed he did his Q loses his powers scene naked because production was short on time and couldn't spend time to finesse shooting around the usual hiding tricks.

You'd figure they wouldn't make that demand of the grand dame of trek though, unless she was an exhibitionist and Marina just wanted to make a show of solidarity.

 

Possibly. I am assuming the soundstage bound scenes were like the bunkroom, the elevator, and the stuff out on the snow.

 

In that episode, you see his body from head to toe, except for Picard's head blocking Q's package. The Trois were only shown from the shoulders up from the front, and from the lower back up from the back, so there was no need to be nude from head to toe.

 

Not contesting that, but we don't know what angles were shot and not used, either.

 

As anyone whose worked on a film set knows, the obvious answer to the preserving actor modesty in the Q-naked-but-for-Picard's-head-shot is low-tack gaffer tape and a piece of opalescent diffusion.

 

Yeah, but stuff just happens wrong sometimes. I remember in the MAKING OF SPACE 1999 book that Schell talked about doing a movie where she just had orchid-looking pasties glued over her nipples and the director came by and ripped them off her and it was like the most painful thing she ever experienced.

 

To clear up a point! The only set from ST6 that I saw on stage 16 was the prison set, where Kirk and McCoy had the beds, and the one alien fought with Kirk.

Marina had no problem with film nudity, as was seen in "The Wicked Lady" where she was full frontal, and I think that in one of the books, Gene was quoted as "insinuating" that Majel was a "Naturalist" or something like that.

But the bottom line is that what I saw is what I SAW! Anyone who wants to dispute that is basically calling me a LIAR! It's not like the "Black Hole" issue, I was THERE, I SAW the shoot, and Ed was very upset over that, but never mentioned it to Majel, one way or the other.

It's like saying that I never saw the Eifel tower in Paris, that it was some sort of a CGI or Photoshop trick! I saw what I saw, end of discussion.

Don't banter it around and cause problems on the board, if you have actual and factual PROOF that I'm lying, then offer it up here!

Greg Stone

 

Ack!

 

Indeed. That no covering material or at the least "pasties" were used is difficult to believe. I seem to recall a story from the DS9 Companion, where some fragrant oil used in Kira's bath in a mirror universe episode counteracted the adhesive of the "pasties" she wore that day and they fell right off.

Larry Nemecek's book, The Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion has been in print for over 20 years. In it, he states that stand-ins were used. I don't have it right in front of me at the moment, but it is in that section for "Menage a Troi."

I know Larry and he's no liar or thief. I've also read that book, (an actual, published book by Pocket Books) many times.

Given their reputability, and especially given the questionable veracity of some of your claims, I'll take their word for it.

 

Why would a low-level special effects employee be on the set of this type of scene?