No, the point of driving is to get from one place to another. The rest is just what we've been brainwashed into wanting by the auto industry.
No, the point of driving is to get from one place to another. The rest is just what we've been brainwashed into wanting by the auto industry.
I know that they already have them in some places, and that some places are considering laws regulating their use. What amazes me is reactions along the lines of "I would never buy a car that drives itself."
Er, a self-driving car, unlike a Human, is never going to be drunk, or speed, blow a stop sign or red light, or change lanes aggressively when there's not enough room and just expect you to get out of the way. I hate driving. I find it stressful and dangerous, especially in winter weather. If we had better public transportation in a lot of areas, I would never drive and not have a car. But as long as that's not politically feasible, I say bring on the self-driving cars. They'd probably lower the accident and driving fatality rates by a ton.
Snow is one of the worst things to drive in, but weather is just one factor, and what some drivers do is not adapt their driving to suit the conditions. Many I time I've been overtaken by some idiot who clearly thinks 80+ on the motorway when visibility is less than 100 yards is safe. Idiots who forgoet to put their fog lights on etc..
^ Toonces! NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
Hell no! If I didn't want to drive I'd take a cab, bus, train or plane.
Hell no! If I didn't want to drive I'd take a cab, bus, train or plane.
This.
Machines are to enhance our lives. When machines can do everything humans can do without supervision, they won't need us any more. I personally would not enjoy that.
"Carbon units infest Enterprise."
Hell no! If I didn't want to drive I'd take a cab, bus, train or plane.
I like driving too, but I could be convinced to let the car drive itself on long trips. However, it's going to take a LOT of convincing that the technology's ready before I put any of my kids in one.
I didn't say or see anything like that in this thread. Why so defensive?Hell no! If I didn't want to drive I'd take a cab, bus, train or plane.
This.
Machines are to enhance our lives. When machines can do everything humans can do without supervision, they won't need us any more. I personally would not enjoy that.
"Carbon units infest Enterprise."
this isn't a response to you specifically as it is to all who have posted along the same lines:
just because you personally may not want to use a self-driving car, why does that mean you get to tell others not to?
Are Siri-like programs that can take dictation wrong because people with working fingers should take their own notes and type their own e-mails?
If you don't like GPS because you prefer to rely on paper maps, should others not be allowed to drive with GPS?
I respect your right to enjoy driving and drive yourself. I hate driving and wish I never had to drive myself anywhere again. I think I should get the choice to use technology that will make the roads safer.
I didn't say or see anything like that in this thread. Why so defensive?This.
Machines are to enhance our lives. When machines can do everything humans can do without supervision, they won't need us any more. I personally would not enjoy that.
"Carbon units infest Enterprise."
this isn't a response to you specifically as it is to all who have posted along the same lines:
just because you personally may not want to use a self-driving car, why does that mean you get to tell others not to?
Are Siri-like programs that can take dictation wrong because people with working fingers should take their own notes and type their own e-mails?
If you don't like GPS because you prefer to rely on paper maps, should others not be allowed to drive with GPS?
I respect your right to enjoy driving and drive yourself. I hate driving and wish I never had to drive myself anywhere again. I think I should get the choice to use technology that will make the roads safer.
Try telling that to Jay Leno.A self-driving car misses the entire point of driving, which is that YOU are in control.
No, the point of driving is to get from one place to another. The rest is just what we've been brainwashed into wanting by the auto industry.
^ And lawyers. The liability cases would be off the charts for something like this....if a driverless car crashes, who's responsible?
Any autodrive feature will requiring human monitoring. It will reduce the driver's workload, but not eliminate it---at least, for the near future. Same way autopilots work.
^ And lawyers. The liability cases would be off the charts for something like this....if a driverless car crashes, who's responsible?
People always bring this up like it's some kind of revelation, but it's really not. Number one, these things are never hitting the road in large numbers until they've been tested like crazy to ensure safety. You would likely insure your self-driving car just as you would insure a car today. If it crashes, the insurance pays. If there is an actual defect in the vehicle that causes the crash, that's a manufacturer liability issue, and we already have a tort system in place for those.
Suffice it to say, while the legal waters for this are untested, they don't exactly represent some vast, unknown minefield that would threaten the entire concept.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.