Oh I feel like Riker wanted to as well, the point is that he didn't, so why couldn't Riker exhibit a similar level of restraint in Up the Long Ladder?He didn't. But I feel like he would have if given the chance.![]()

Oh I feel like Riker wanted to as well, the point is that he didn't, so why couldn't Riker exhibit a similar level of restraint in Up the Long Ladder?He didn't. But I feel like he would have if given the chance.![]()
That's not what viable means, here. It means capable of living on their own at that moment, which at that point in time, the clones didn't appear to be at all.And since the clones were apparently capable of developing into independent beings, they were in fact "viable."
I didn't say that they were. Note that I didn't say it was exactly like an abortion, either.Neither Riker nor Pulaski were pregnant.... so it's more like an abortion.
Viable also means "capable of living and developing under favorable conditions," for example a viable pregnancy.That's not what viable means, here. It means capable of living on their own at that moment, which at that point in time, the clones didn't appear to be at all.And since the clones were apparently capable of developing into independent beings, they were in fact "viable."
Viable also means "capable of living and developing under favorable conditions," for example a viable pregnancy.That's not what viable means, here. It means capable of living on their own at that moment, which at that point in time, the clones didn't appear to be at all.And since the clones were apparently capable of developing into independent beings, they were in fact "viable."
The clones were in fact viable because they were continuing to develop toward maturity, toward their metaphoric "birth."
![]()
On a lighter note if they didn't kill their clones, the clones would inevitably end up as evil-alternate versions bent on destroying the galaxy. Kill them now or in a climactic space batter later, what's the difference? Therefore I judge it to be a good move on their part![]()
Wrong. I associate the term with family relationships, not their sex lives. If I've just met these people, I'm not even thinking about how they got their baby.
People can cheat on their spouse, yet still categorize themselves as monogamous or polygamous, as the case may be. Monogamy only means you have one spouse at a time.
They're a sovereign state (sovereign planet) collecting genetic tissue from visitors is perfectly legal under their legal system.You'd think Picard/Riker would be a little more pissed off that this government is cool with kidnapping/cloning against people's will. All their leaders should be thrown in the brig.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.