And I suspect I'm not wrong. When seemingly everyone jumps on the wagon of something as gospel and tries to shout down others asking questions I start doubting the validity of their claims.
So you apply the same rigorous standards to this as you do to your hatred of any Trek that's happened since the fall of the Soviet Union? Good to know.
You know what also makes a buttload of money? Fossil fuels and the corporations that mine, drill, and refine them. So, if it's all about money, why turn on that longstanding and surefire source of revenue for something new and risky and experimental that other corporations are fighting to suppress?The alarmists haven't proven a damn thing other than cooking up a way for some (like governments and businesses) to make money off the gullible. Carbon taxes and "green" products galore anyone?
So, you're smarter than all the experts in this field, and they're all in on a massive conspiracy of tens of thousands of scientists to deceive governments and the people that has never been exposed. Your arrogance is in a life or death struggle with your ignorance there.
The "Y2K Bug" was a very real computer issue which many businesses and governments took proactive measures to correct (and others failed to), and which the media ignorantly spread over-dramatic misinformation about. It was not predicted to be an end of civilization scenario by reputable media outlets and computer scientists. So yes, I do remember it, and you are grossly wrong once again.Anyone remember Y2K as well as the certainty we were headed for another ice age?
Also, 68% of climate studies in the 60s and 70s predicted warming and only 10% predicted cooling, with vastly less than that predicting anything as dramatic as a new ice age. Keep trying, though. It's amusing.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm