In "The Enemy Within" one of the key plot points was that Sulu's landing party were unable to risk being beamed aboard due to the transporter malfunction. Why didn't they simply fly a shuttle down to retrieve them?
Well, that's not quite accurate. The idea of the Enterprise carrying one or more shuttlecraft (and the hangar deck to launch and retrieve them) was there right from the beginning, in Matt Jefferies' early concept sketches. However, at the time "The Enemy Within" was filmed, the full-size shuttlecraft mockup, interior set and effects miniature hadn't been built yet.The writers hadn't created the shuttle yet.
Welcome to The Trek BBS! As you can see, I revised my response slightly.I'm not new to Star Trek itself, just to the message boards. The shuttle question has been one I could never figure out and it always bothered me.
Well, that's not quite accurate. The idea of the Enterprise carrying one or more shuttlecraft (and the hangar deck to launch and retrieve them) was there right from the beginning, in Matt Jefferies' early concept sketches. However, at the time "The Enemy Within" was filmed, the full-size shuttlecraft mockup, interior set and effects miniature hadn't been built yet.The writers hadn't created the shuttle yet.
1. The shuttles could have been in for upgrade.
2. The shuttles could have been loaned out for some emergency
3. At that stage Starships didn't have shuttles - only Starbases.
4. Some technobabble in the atmosphere stopped them from using the shuttle.
What I want to know is why they just didn't beam down heaps of blankets, tents, sleeping bags. It doesn't matter if they are duplicated. Sulu et. al could have been sheltering under a mountain of blankets. Still cold of course.
What I want to know is why they just didn't beam down heaps of blankets, tents, sleeping bags. It doesn't matter if they are duplicated. Sulu et. al could have been sheltering under a mountain of blankets. Still cold of course.
That wouldn't work because the "good" blankets would warm them up, but the "evil" blankets would just make them colder. No net gain.![]()
And so they would have gotten McDonald's or Subway's coffee?I don't wanna' even consider the "evil" coffee!
Sincerely,
Bill
1. The shuttles could have been in for upgrade.
2. The shuttles could have been loaned out for some emergency
3. At that stage Starships didn't have shuttles - only Starbases.
4. Some technobabble in the atmosphere stopped them from using the shuttle.
What I want to know is why they just didn't beam down heaps of blankets, tents, sleeping bags. It doesn't matter if they are duplicated. Sulu et. al could have been sheltering under a mountain of blankets. Still cold of course.
In the end if they had not found a solution, rather than them die, would they have attempted to beam them up as duplicates?
The transporter wasn't working. The Evil Kirk phase red a big hole in it in Engineering.
1. The shuttles could have been in for upgrade.
2. The shuttles could have been loaned out for some emergency
3. At that stage Starships didn't have shuttles - only Starbases.
4. Some technobabble in the atmosphere stopped them from using the shuttle.
What I want to know is why they just didn't beam down heaps of blankets, tents, sleeping bags. It doesn't matter if they are duplicated. Sulu et. al could have been sheltering under a mountain of blankets. Still cold of course.
In the end if they had not found a solution, rather than them die, would they have attempted to beam them up as duplicates?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.