Hopefully 8 to 10 seconds is below your threshold for ruining the pacing!
Those three minutes and thirty seconds make the movie drag for me.
Hopefully 8 to 10 seconds is below your threshold for ruining the pacing!
Hopefully 8 to 10 seconds is below your threshold for ruining the pacing!
Those three minutes and thirty seconds make the movie drag for me.
I think those extra scenes kill the pacing of The Wrath of Khan. I remember watching the theatrical cut the first time on Blu-ray (first time I had seen the theatrical version in years) and thinking how crisp it was compared to the Director's Edition.
But, everyone has different things that they look for in a film.![]()
Well as a format Blu-ray is just a fraction slower than DVD and film.
So the theatrical cut of the Blu-ray is 9 seconds longer than the DVD, despite being the exact same cut.
It's the same for all movies, put in a copy of any movie--even ones that came out same day like when Iron Man 3 comes out. The Blu-ray will be 8 to 10 seconds longer than either the movie in theater or the DVD that comes out the same day.
It's due to the slight difference in frame rate but it's virtually unnoticeable. It's nothing compared to the 4.2% speed up on PAL DVDs which results in a 2 hour movie running 5 minutes shorter.Well as a format Blu-ray is just a fraction slower than DVD and film.
So the theatrical cut of the Blu-ray is 9 seconds longer than the DVD, despite being the exact same cut.
It's the same for all movies, put in a copy of any movie--even ones that came out same day like when Iron Man 3 comes out. The Blu-ray will be 8 to 10 seconds longer than either the movie in theater or the DVD that comes out the same day.
Er... what ? Really ? That's... retarded.![]()
It's due to the slight difference in frame rate but it's virtually unnoticeable. It's nothing compared to the 4.2% speed up on PAL DVDs which results in a 2 hour movie running 5 minutes shorter.Well as a format Blu-ray is just a fraction slower than DVD and film.
So the theatrical cut of the Blu-ray is 9 seconds longer than the DVD, despite being the exact same cut.
It's the same for all movies, put in a copy of any movie--even ones that came out same day like when Iron Man 3 comes out. The Blu-ray will be 8 to 10 seconds longer than either the movie in theater or the DVD that comes out the same day.
Er... what ? Really ? That's... retarded.![]()
Didn't know why that was, so thanks for that info. I agree, 8 seconds over a 2 hour movie would clearly be unnoticeable. LOL.It's due to the slight difference in frame rate but it's virtually unnoticeable. It's nothing compared to the 4.2% speed up on PAL DVDs which results in a 2 hour movie running 5 minutes shorter.Er... what ? Really ? That's... retarded.![]()
Don't understand why it's retarded though. ??
I think Blu-rays are smarter actually.
Didn't know why that was, so thanks for that info. I agree, 8 seconds over a 2 hour movie would clearly be unnoticeable. LOL.It's due to the slight difference in frame rate but it's virtually unnoticeable. It's nothing compared to the 4.2% speed up on PAL DVDs which results in a 2 hour movie running 5 minutes shorter.
Don't understand why it's retarded though. ??
I think Blu-rays are smarter actually.
NTSC used to run at 30 fps (60Hz) but when colour was introduced it was slowed down by 0.01% to 29.97 fps (59.94 Hz). This results in 24 fps movies being slowed down to 23.976 fps.
Didn't know why that was, so thanks for that info. I agree, 8 seconds over a 2 hour movie would clearly be unnoticeable. LOL.
Don't understand why it's retarded though. ??
I think Blu-rays are smarter actually.
NTSC used to run at 30 fps (60Hz) but when colour was introduced it was slowed down by 0.01% to 29.97 fps (59.94 Hz). This results in 24 fps movies being slowed down to 23.976 fps.
Okay and does that mean that Blu-ray does or does not have that slow down?
You beat me to it, GameOn! I think I only have maybe two or three movies in my collection encoded at 24fps. Off the top of my head, the only one I can remember for certain is the UK Cine Asia release of Jackie Chan's Little Big Soldier.Blu-ray supports both 23.976 and 24 but the majority of blu-rays are encoded at 23.976 so that 3:2 pulldown can be applied to maintain compatibility with NTSC.
Don't understand why it's retarded though. ??
I think Blu-rays are smarter actually.
Well as a format Blu-ray is just a fraction slower than DVD and film.
So the theatrical cut of the Blu-ray is 9 seconds longer than the DVD, despite being the exact same cut.
It's the same for all movies, put in a copy of any movie--even ones that came out same day like when Iron Man 3 comes out. The Blu-ray will be 8 to 10 seconds longer than either the movie in theater or the DVD that comes out the same day.
Hopefully 8 to 10 seconds is below your threshold for ruining the pacing!
That only applies to PAL DVD which they speed up by 4.2% from 24fps to 25fps. This results in a 2 hour movie running about 5 mintues shorted on PAL DVD.I would disagree that blu-ray will only be 8-10 seconds longer than a DVD.
I would say blu-ray is about 4% longer than DVD.
Though that might only be PAL regions. NTSC regions might be different.
As others have said, this is not correct. Almost every Blu-ray runs at 1080p/23.976 frames per second, which works out to the same speed and time as NTSC DVDs, which are natively 480i/59.94 fields per second.Well as a format Blu-ray is just a fraction slower than DVD and film.
I believe this is because some DVD players or software video players use a "drop frame" formula to calculate the timecode and running time, while others use "non-drop frame." This results in a difference of about 3.59 seconds per hour.I'm in a PAL region so it's difficult for me to check the running time difference between blu-ray and NTSC DVD. The only one I've been able to check is The Avengers which I imported from the US and there is a 6 second difference in the running time. I also tried converting some 23.976 videos to NTSC DVD and it reduces their running time by a several seconds. I'm guessing it's a side effect of NTSC display timings or 3:2 pulldown being added to the video.
I would say the majority will go with the DC, but for me, the theatrical is the superior version. I once read a review where the author suggested the DC was effectively an "out" allowing those who secretly liked the film to actually admit it because this new cut is just "so much better paced" blah blah.Well, since TMP is only available on BluRay in its theatrical form, I have to ask: should I stick to my Director's Edition, or go back to the Theatrical one on BluRay ? I don't remember much about that cut.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.