• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Federation is inhumanly benevolent

You can interpret it any way you like, that's the beauty of Trek. But Scott didn't seem to disagree with what he was saying.


True. I think he wasn't moved enough to care, but that's just my opinion. I really want to rewatch that now, I like that episode.
 
You can interpret it any way you like, that's the beauty of Trek. But Scott didn't seem to disagree with what he was saying.
Not only didn't Scotty disagree, he at some point relented and beamed Fox and his assistant down.

:)
 
To someone from 2000 years ago, or a 1000 years ago, or even a century ago, today's society would probably look inhumanly benevolent. I guess I too am an optimist. I think we sometimes take for granted how good we have it today and how much progress we've made over time.
 
To someone from 2000 years ago, or a 1000 years ago, or even a century ago, today's society would probably look inhumanly benevolent. I guess I too am an optimist. I think we sometimes take for granted how good we have it today and how much progress we've made over time.


I agree, great point.

Also, I really like your avatar, I need a better one.
 
89157821.gif
.

Is this any better?

:)
 
That's much better! What do I owe you?


Btw, back to the thread topic, here is an example of what I was trying to say. In USA, at least, there are many campaigns against drunk driving, they usually boil down to, "Drive Drunk, Go To Jail". They don't say, "drive drunk and if you're caught you will be subject to trial and possible imprisonment if convicted guilty" but those things must happen to actually go to jail. Yes, you can be put in holding before arraignment and have to pay bail, but you are not necessarily in jail as that usually refers to an actual sentence. So my interpretation of Fox threatening Scotty is I can have you put in jail, by bringing charges that you disobeyed a direct order and after a courtmartial you can be sent a penal colony. He is by bringing charges, sending him to a penal colony, but not without due process. But when you're threatening someone, you don't mention how they might get out of it in the same breath. Therefore, no mention of a trial.

Ugh. I'm sorry that's so long.
 
"Drive Drunk, Go To Jail"
In Washington State, if you're caught driving "impaired" you go to jail prior to any trial.

However, it does take a trial to send someone subsequently into the penal system. Fox's statement does (at least the way he phrased it) imply that he possessed the personal authority to sent Scott to a penal colony, solely on his say so.

That's much better! What do I owe you?
I like seafood and a view of the sunset.

:)

:)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top