Buying S2 in its current state simply sends the message to CBS that this level of quality is all it takes to get your money. But that aside...
Let's assume that we get what I think we can unanimously agree we ALL want, which is for CBS to learn its lesson from this situation and for future seasons to be up to the level of S1. So down the road (2014 or so) CBS has 6 great-looking seasons and one mediocre (at best) season to sell (on home video but also streaming and TV syndication). If (as I contend) the incremental costs involved in correcting S2's flaws are relatively small (but not to say trivial) given the scope of the entire project, before wrapping the entire TNG-R project and moving on to, say, DS9, why wouldn't CBS revisit S2 to bring it up to the level of the other seasons? Sure they don't have to, but they get good PR and they'll sell you another box.
Sure I'd rather have a corrected S2 now rather than later, but I only want to buy S2 once -- when it's done right.
I can only point to industry precedent; Fox remastered the Patton BD to a much smaller market four years later when the initial release got mostly positive reviews (the outcry over excessive DNR came some months/years later). Here we have a higher-profile release, with a long buildup of criticism of the PQ leading up to mostly mixed first-hand reviews.
IMO we should be calling for a re-remaster of S2 sooner rather than later (owing to short attention spans in the biz), rather than giving CBS a mulligan for S2. Everyone votes with their wallet; just think about the message you're sending.
realistically I dont see the re-remaster happening, even though business case might be there (less sales for fixed box, but also significantly less cost to invest).
A couple more reviews. No mention of any effects problems, and they actually take issue more with the quality of the season itself (which seems to me about right).
http://io9.com/5965278/that-new-blu...make-you-learn-to-love-star-trek-tng-season-2
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/12...lu-ray-review?abthid=50bcca68b96729f359000037
It takes something egregious like Patton (also by HTV) or Predator (hm, I wonder...) for reviewers to take exception.
Otherwise, only those intimately involved with this (aka fans like us, TrekCore, Digital Bits) will notice a drop from season 1.
"Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 2 "The Child" Opening Shot SD to Remastered Comparison"
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gy567rerhYg[/yt]
"Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 2 "The Child" Opening Shot SD to Remastered Comparison"
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gy567rerhYg[/yt]
That shot along with the music is one of my favorites in the series. Glad it "survived" the transition looking good.
"Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 2 "The Child" Opening Shot SD to Remastered Comparison"
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gy567rerhYg[/yt]
That shot along with the music is one of my favorites in the series. Glad it "survived" the transition looking good.
I like that scene too! It really lets you know its the start of a new season.
As much as it bugs me, I can understand why they didn't want to do it...one: it's not the way it was before. And two: they'd have to correct every open shuttlebay shot in the entire run to be consistent.I do wish they had taken this opportunity to fix an "annoying glitch" with what we see out the shuttlebay door, where should see SOME of the exterior of the ship based on the placement of the door on the model.
"Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 2 "The Child" Opening Shot SD to Remastered Comparison"
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gy567rerhYg[/yt]
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.