I don't know what is more stupid, subjectively believing in a higher being or thinking that religion really works like that. To believe is inherently human. It is not as simple as lieing vs. telling the truth. Sure, we have natural sciences but all kind of social stuff has some degree of belief in it.^^^If you really feel hurt, sorry. All I wanted is for people to think about why being old somehow gives it a free pass. By that standard, isn't astrology classier than spiritualism?
Indeed by that standard, monarchy is more acceptable than democracy!
Religion is not an attribute of a person like race, sex, sexual preference, nationality. Religion is a social institution, and religious belief is more like membership in a political party. Except that religion is a kind of party that insists its members believe in the supernatural and reject reason as the final authority. Religions are like armies, they support the status quo (unless they are shattered, which means you are in a revolution.) As such, they defend the social prejudices of the order they support, i.e., they preach bigotry.
This is not an accident of temperament in the individual believer, it is their social function, their role. This is why religions so often take the form of a state church. Condemning the institution is not bigotry. The charge is bogus. Unfortunately, the notion that somehow one's religion (which overwhelmingly is the one either born into or married) really is an essential part of one's identity really is close to religious bigotry. After all, if it is bigotry to reject religion, you must respect those who reject false religion. But if false religion really is somehow who those wrong believers truly are, then they too must be rejected.
The only path out of the madness is to reject religion as an institution. This does not require telling lies, as in pretending that anyone whose religion tells them to reject simple facts like evolution is (in a loose sense of the word) crazy.
I am a social democrat and of course I could list a dozen good arguments for it but they are basically just a rationalization for my gut feeling.
Why do we watch Trek? Because we want to believe (X-Files was right) in a better future. Belief always implies doubt, otherwise it is not belief. Only fundamentalists and their atheistic counterparts (Dawkins, Hitchens and so on) view belief as a truth statement.
We have already established that the question is not the form, all kind of human social activity implies belief. The question is what people believe in. In the case of God this implies that the question of existence is irrelevant except to the aforementioned fundamentalists. Content, what the word God signifies, matters.
In polytheistic religions gods can basically manipulated to recreate natural balance. You sacrifice some fruits, a goat or a virgin to appease the fertility goddess during a drought. When monotheism emerged god signified something entirely different to the ancient Israelities, he stood for ethical horror, the absolute, the law and so on. No more holistic balance with nature crap. And to repeat my former point, God doesn't literally exist, the Holy of Hollies is basically just a void that covers up that there is nothing there.
In the Jesus story the point about the Holy of Hollies is even clearer, when the curtain is ripped apart there is nothing behind it and the "son" of God just died. All that remains is the community of believers which is open for everybody.
To kill off God is more radical than atheism as it actively reveals the horror of being on our own. Without this you sooner or later create a substitute God (to remain with the secular fundamentalists, science in the case of Dawkins).
To surprise you even more, the communist idea of radical change and a universal emancipatory collective is first to be found in messianic religions. The irony is that your political belief basically first emerged in what you utterly hate.
I totally agree that institutionalized religion usually sucks yet not because they are true to their texts. I doubt that we would be culturally as far as we are today without the monotheistic revolution.
This Pagan logic of balance can still often be found, e.g. in the case of climate change (we raped mother Earth and now we are punished) or in the case of Christian fundamentalists (Robertson claiming that 9/11 was a punishment for the wicked liberal American way of life). But Jewish holocaust survivors do not think that they did anything wrong and got punished for it, they view it as nightmare and catastrophe. No childish believe that God is up there and takes care of us if we are nice or whatever.