Fassbender has that "dainty", prissy look that Pierce Brosnan had. THAT is not Bond. Hamm would bring the same tough guy coolness to the role that Connery and now, Daniel Craig, brought. However, I have never been able to see Hamm as Batman, though I'm sure he'd be better than Christian Bale.I'd love to see his take on Bond...
Besides, if we want a 60s era Bond again, look no further than Michael 'X-men First Class' Fassbender...
Indeed. The way this show is presented we will probably learn Don's answer in some off hand low key way. Maybe one of the women will call Don or perhaps we'll find out in some way that Don has never cheated on Megan...still.He might answer "Yes" to the question of being alone, but I don't think it's a given that Don will cheat again at this point. That would be too expected. Also I doubt Season 6 will start off exactly right where we left off.
Has any season started right where the last left off?
After seeing the "Brief nudty" warning before the episode starts, as a straight male, I feel cheated.
Fassbender has that "dainty", prissy look that Pierce Brosnan had.
Megan's mom cuts straight through the BS to the heart of the matter, doesn't she? Hard to see how she ended up with Megan's dad.
I'd love to see his take on Bond...
Problem is he's not British and, as talented as he is, we've got no indication he can do accents.
I can't wait for 1968.
Exactly.I'm surprised that no one has yet commented on what a big change there is in Don on one regard. When Betty wanted to go back to modeling, Don basically sabotaged it. Here he did the exact opposite and helped Megan towards her dream, even knowing it might mean she'd leave him, just like Peggy. That's a big step.
With two seasons remaining, assuming Weiner sticks to his word about not leaving the 60s, they can't skip 1968.I almost hope they skip 68. That year is all about horrible national events: the presidential election, the Tet Offensive, the DNC convention, the assassinations of MLK and RFK, etc. One thing I appreciate about MM is that they typically don't go for the cliched "where were you when [blank] happened." I'm not sure they can avoid that if they set the series in 1968.
We'll see.He's still a selfish man at heart.
Technically, the first year of any decade is not on the 0, it's on the 1. You need a year 0 to make it work, otherwise. 11 is the first number of the teens, not 10.I like the complexity of the situation. He makes a pretty determined choice there not to repeat the mistakes he made with Betty, supporting Megan's career ambitions (after her mom basically says if he doesn't he's got a chance to have the wife he supposedly really wants). And it still ends up making him unhappy.
Don can't win for losing.
With two seasons remaining, assuming Weiner sticks to his word about not leaving the 60s, they can't skip 1968.I almost hope they skip 68. That year is all about horrible national events: the presidential election, the Tet Offensive, the DNC convention, the assassinations of MLK and RFK, etc. One thing I appreciate about MM is that they typically don't go for the cliched "where were you when [blank] happened." I'm not sure they can avoid that if they set the series in 1968.
Technically, the first tear of any decade is not on the 0, it's on the 1. You need a year 0 to make it work, otherwise. 11 is the first number of the teens, not 10.With two seasons remaining, assuming Weiner sticks to his word about not leaving the 60s, they can't skip 1968.I almost hope they skip 68. That year is all about horrible national events: the presidential election, the Tet Offensive, the DNC convention, the assassinations of MLK and RFK, etc. One thing I appreciate about MM is that they typically don't go for the cliched "where were you when [blank] happened." I'm not sure they can avoid that if they set the series in 1968.
Technically, the first tear of any decade is not on the 0, it's on the 1. You need a year 0 to make it work, otherwise. 11 is the first number of the teens, not 10.With two seasons remaining, assuming Weiner sticks to his word about not leaving the 60s, they can't skip 1968.
Yeah, that's more or less what I was thinking.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.