Knight Templar
Commodore
NASA Authorization Act of 2005
Passed 383-15
Now what's your excuse?
Bush was president in 2005 and Republicans controlled both houses of Congress.
Not seeing your point there.
NASA Authorization Act of 2005
Passed 383-15
Now what's your excuse?
Democrats still voted for it.
Well dude, either you are for or against flying to Mars. I think a few hundred billion dollars is a small price to pay to get up there. We did it in the sixties where economic output has been about half as high as today so it should be a piece of cake today.And do we have hundreds of billions of dollars to throw at it?
Well dude, either you are for or against flying to Mars. I think a few hundred billion dollars is a small price to pay to get up there. We did it in the sixties where economic output has been about half as high as today so it should be a piece of cake today.And do we have hundreds of billions of dollars to throw at it?
The budget issue is not a matter of feasibility but priority.
In my opinion part of the problem is the notion that spending the money on narrow-targeted research would be a far better idea.
This is not how it works. When I seek a book about a particular theme the book usually sucks, whereas whenever I accidentally stumble over something it is usually quite interesting. And that's not just me, folks in the military came up with the internet because they had some freedom, some space to breath. Any great invention is to a large degree accidental and when we fly to Mars a lot of discoveries we make there will have unanticipated effects upon our knowledge.
In Zeframe Cochrane's times the argument for spending money on something "useful" would have been even stronger than today but precisely via spending money on something totally useless, a faster-than-light drive in a post-nuclear world, humankind made a large leap forward.
It clearly needs people like Zubrin to remind us of this all the time. As NASA and ESA are already working together to some degree money cannot be an argument against manned spaceflight. The history books will probably look back one day at this space hiatus and ask "what the hell where they thinking?!".
Yeah people, let's be nice to the guy who:Now, given that those issues are offensive to people here I'll go back to my post and edit them out if possible. I have no wish to start any kind of angry exchange over conflicting values. Nothing says we can't get along just because we disagree.
Yeah people, let's be nice to the guy who:Now, given that those issues are offensive to people here I'll go back to my post and edit them out if possible. I have no wish to start any kind of angry exchange over conflicting values. Nothing says we can't get along just because we disagree.
1) wants to take away women's choices.
2) denies gay people's rights.
3) wants US soldiers to kill more Arab people.
4) thinks space exploration is a political tool and not a scientific endeavour.
5) supports discrimination of minorities.
6) supports exploitation of workers.
Yeah, there's really no reason we can't get along swimmingly.
I just worded it more harshly, but the meaning is the same.1) supports abortion rights.
2) supports homosexual rights.
3) is in favor of cutting dramatically the U.S. military.
4) is opposed to the manned space program.
5) is committed to advancing and protecting minority groups.
6) is anti business and pro labor.
I inferred nothing. You said you were never going to vote for a party that:
I just worded it more harshly, but the meaning is the same.1) supports abortion rights.
2) supports homosexual rights.
3) is in favor of cutting dramatically the U.S. military.
4) is opposed to the manned space program.
5) is committed to advancing and protecting minority groups.
6) is anti business and pro labor.
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me.![]()
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me.![]()
You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?
Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on...
You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you?![]()
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me.![]()
You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?
Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on...
You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you?![]()
No. I voted twice for Bill Clinton, and happily so. Bush 41 was a stultifying disappointment and Bob Dole---to be kind---was a tired, archaic old fart with stale ideas whereas President Clinton was a fairly successful centrist chief executive who headed up a good and rapidly growing economy.
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me.![]()
You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?
Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on...
You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you?![]()
No. I voted twice for Bill Clinton, and happily so. Bush 41 was a stultifying disappointment and Bob Dole---to be kind---was a tired, archaic old fart with stale ideas whereas President Clinton was a fairly successful centrist chief executive who headed up a good and rapidly growing economy.
I see women has having a right to choose what happens inside their bodies. Just like you. Calling it "abortion right" is disingenuous at best, and willingly obfuscating the issue with appeals to emotion at worst.If you view abortion as a "right" and thus a valid choice you might have a point on #1 I suppose.
What do you think the military budget of the US is spent unto? Pretty flowers and animal balloons?I said absolutely nothing about the
"military killing more Arab people" (or killing anyone for that matter).
You argued about the Democratic party being opposed to "manned space exploration". You made a scientific endeavour into a political tool for your own agenda.I said nothing about the space program as a political tool.
You would not vote for a party "committed to advancing and protecting minority groups". You would not vote for a party which is "pro labour". What is unclear?I said nothing about discriminating against minorities or exploiting workers.
In short, your own posts prove you wrong.In short. You lied.
You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?
Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on...
You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you?![]()
No. I voted twice for Bill Clinton, and happily so. Bush 41 was a stultifying disappointment and Bob Dole---to be kind---was a tired, archaic old fart with stale ideas whereas President Clinton was a fairly successful centrist chief executive who headed up a good and rapidly growing economy.
You do realize that the Republicans did control Congress for 6 of Clintons 8 years don't you? Everything like the balanced budgets and welfare reform was passed by a Republican congress and signed by Clinton.
You do realize that the Republicans did control Congress for 6 of Clintons 8 years don't you? Everything like the balanced budgets and welfare reform was passed by a Republican congress and signed by Clinton.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.