• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The future of the Republican Party.

And do we have hundreds of billions of dollars to throw at it?
Well dude, either you are for or against flying to Mars. I think a few hundred billion dollars is a small price to pay to get up there. We did it in the sixties where economic output has been about half as high as today so it should be a piece of cake today.
The budget issue is not a matter of feasibility but priority.
 
And do we have hundreds of billions of dollars to throw at it?
Well dude, either you are for or against flying to Mars. I think a few hundred billion dollars is a small price to pay to get up there. We did it in the sixties where economic output has been about half as high as today so it should be a piece of cake today.
The budget issue is not a matter of feasibility but priority.

Agreed.

And I wish to point out again that even under current budget plans, NASA will spend 140-160 billion dollars over the next 10 years without solid plans to actually do anything beyond Earth orbit.

It is simply a matter of prioritizing. We're not talking about building a starship. We're talking about traveling to the second closest planet to Earth in the solar system.

and as G. Harry Stine (Lee Correy) once said, once you are in Earth orbit you are "halfway to anywhere"
 
In my opinion part of the problem is the notion that spending the money on narrow-targeted research would be a far better idea.
This is not how it works. When I seek a book about a particular theme the book usually sucks, whereas whenever I accidentally stumble over something it is usually quite interesting. And that's not just me, folks in the military came up with the internet because they had some freedom, some space to breath. Any great invention is to a large degree accidental and when we fly to Mars a lot of discoveries we make there will have unanticipated effects upon our knowledge.

In Zeframe Cochrane's times the argument for spending money on something "useful" would have been even stronger than today but precisely via spending money on something totally useless, a faster-than-light drive in a post-nuclear world, humankind made a large leap forward.

It clearly needs people like Zubrin to remind us of this all the time. As NASA and ESA are already working together to some degree money cannot be an argument against manned spaceflight. The history books will probably look back one day at this space hiatus and ask "what the hell where they thinking?!".
 
In my opinion part of the problem is the notion that spending the money on narrow-targeted research would be a far better idea.
This is not how it works. When I seek a book about a particular theme the book usually sucks, whereas whenever I accidentally stumble over something it is usually quite interesting. And that's not just me, folks in the military came up with the internet because they had some freedom, some space to breath. Any great invention is to a large degree accidental and when we fly to Mars a lot of discoveries we make there will have unanticipated effects upon our knowledge.

In Zeframe Cochrane's times the argument for spending money on something "useful" would have been even stronger than today but precisely via spending money on something totally useless, a faster-than-light drive in a post-nuclear world, humankind made a large leap forward.

It clearly needs people like Zubrin to remind us of this all the time. As NASA and ESA are already working together to some degree money cannot be an argument against manned spaceflight. The history books will probably look back one day at this space hiatus and ask "what the hell where they thinking?!".

Agreed completely. Applied science springs from the womb of basic or general science
 
After observing the Republican party for the past several months with its clown car of a primary and its inexplicable war on women's health, I think the GOP needs to be put into a straitjacket and then locked in a padded room before it can do anymore harm to itself and to the country.
 
Now, given that those issues are offensive to people here I'll go back to my post and edit them out if possible. I have no wish to start any kind of angry exchange over conflicting values. Nothing says we can't get along just because we disagree.
Yeah people, let's be nice to the guy who:

1) wants to take away women's choices.
2) denies gay people's rights.
3) wants US soldiers to kill more Arab people.
4) thinks space exploration is a political tool and not a scientific endeavour.
5) supports discrimination of minorities.
6) supports exploitation of workers.

Yeah, there's really no reason we can't get along swimmingly.
 
Now, given that those issues are offensive to people here I'll go back to my post and edit them out if possible. I have no wish to start any kind of angry exchange over conflicting values. Nothing says we can't get along just because we disagree.
Yeah people, let's be nice to the guy who:

1) wants to take away women's choices.
2) denies gay people's rights.
3) wants US soldiers to kill more Arab people.
4) thinks space exploration is a political tool and not a scientific endeavour.
5) supports discrimination of minorities.
6) supports exploitation of workers.

Yeah, there's really no reason we can't get along swimmingly.

I never said anything about #1, #3, #4, #5, & #6. You can make that argument about #2 but I recognize that is a matter not everyone will ever agree on.

If you want to criticize my positions, please criticize what I've actually said and not what you infer.
 
I inferred nothing. You said you were never going to vote for a party that:

1) supports abortion rights.

2) supports homosexual rights.

3) is in favor of cutting dramatically the U.S. military.

4) is opposed to the manned space program.

5) is committed to advancing and protecting minority groups.

6) is anti business and pro labor.
I just worded it more harshly, but the meaning is the same.
 
I inferred nothing. You said you were never going to vote for a party that:

1) supports abortion rights.

2) supports homosexual rights.

3) is in favor of cutting dramatically the U.S. military.

4) is opposed to the manned space program.

5) is committed to advancing and protecting minority groups.

6) is anti business and pro labor.
I just worded it more harshly, but the meaning is the same.

If you view abortion as a "right" and thus a valid choice you might have a point on #1 I suppose.

I said absolutely nothing about the

"military killing more Arab people" (or killing anyone for that matter).

I said nothing about the space program as a political tool.

I said nothing about discriminating against minorities or exploiting workers.

In short. You lied.
 
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me. :(
 
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me. :(

You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?

Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on... :p

You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you? :p
 
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me. :(

You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?

Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on... :p

You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you? :p

No. I voted twice for Bill Clinton, and happily so. Bush 41 was a stultifying disappointment and Bob Dole---to be kind---was a tired, archaic old fart with stale ideas whereas President Clinton was a fairly successful centrist chief executive who headed up a good and rapidly growing economy.
 
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me. :(

You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?

Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on... :p

You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you? :p

No. I voted twice for Bill Clinton, and happily so. Bush 41 was a stultifying disappointment and Bob Dole---to be kind---was a tired, archaic old fart with stale ideas whereas President Clinton was a fairly successful centrist chief executive who headed up a good and rapidly growing economy.

I will not ask about Dubya then for the sake of my own sanity and blood pressure. :p
 
It's like I've said many times before both on these boards and to my friends. I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me. :(

You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?

Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on... :p

You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you? :p

No. I voted twice for Bill Clinton, and happily so. Bush 41 was a stultifying disappointment and Bob Dole---to be kind---was a tired, archaic old fart with stale ideas whereas President Clinton was a fairly successful centrist chief executive who headed up a good and rapidly growing economy.

You do realize that the Republicans did control Congress for 6 of Clintons 8 years don't you? Everything like the balanced budgets and welfare reform was passed by a Republican congress and signed by Clinton.
 
If you view abortion as a "right" and thus a valid choice you might have a point on #1 I suppose.
I see women has having a right to choose what happens inside their bodies. Just like you. Calling it "abortion right" is disingenuous at best, and willingly obfuscating the issue with appeals to emotion at worst.

I said absolutely nothing about the

"military killing more Arab people" (or killing anyone for that matter).
What do you think the military budget of the US is spent unto? Pretty flowers and animal balloons?

I said nothing about the space program as a political tool.
You argued about the Democratic party being opposed to "manned space exploration". You made a scientific endeavour into a political tool for your own agenda.

I said nothing about discriminating against minorities or exploiting workers.
You would not vote for a party "committed to advancing and protecting minority groups". You would not vote for a party which is "pro labour". What is unclear?

In short. You lied.
In short, your own posts prove you wrong.
 
You're in your 30s, aren't you? I don't see how the GOP could ever have been a valid option for a thinking man of that age?

Now granted the GOP has reached a totally new level of idiocy in recent years but come on... :p

You've been voting for less than 20 years I guess? Did Bob Dole excite you? :p

No. I voted twice for Bill Clinton, and happily so. Bush 41 was a stultifying disappointment and Bob Dole---to be kind---was a tired, archaic old fart with stale ideas whereas President Clinton was a fairly successful centrist chief executive who headed up a good and rapidly growing economy.

You do realize that the Republicans did control Congress for 6 of Clintons 8 years don't you? Everything like the balanced budgets and welfare reform was passed by a Republican congress and signed by Clinton.

It took both sides working together in concert to create the political and economic environment of 1995-2001. Bill Clinton deserves as much credit as the Gingrich-Dole Congress because he was willing to reach fair minded compromise with the GOP and come up with sensible centrist solutions. It wasn't all Congress in the late '90s. Bill Clinton had the leeway after the 1996 election to veto everything Gingrich, Dick Armey, Dole and Trent Lott sent to his desk but he didn't. He did what he felt was in the nation's best interests. That's why I consider him along with Ronald Reagan to be one of the two best Presidents of my lifetime.
 
You do realize that the Republicans did control Congress for 6 of Clintons 8 years don't you? Everything like the balanced budgets and welfare reform was passed by a Republican congress and signed by Clinton.

Yet they still managed to completely destroy the health care reform.

You can always count on the GOP when it comes to this stuff.

:rolleyes:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top