If he lived every moment of that life, then yes. But if he saw that life as it was presented to the viewer, in segments meant to convey the message the builders of the probe wanted conveyed, then perhaps not so much.
The episode was tainted by the idiotic decision to let the viewer know something Picard does not - that its all fake and he's actually on the Enterprise bridge - way to take us out of the story. It would have had far more effect if we too had been questioning "is it real?" the whole time. I didn't need to hear Beverly randomly spouting medibabble on the Bridge thanks
An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, the Ambrose Bierce short story from 1890, is the basis for this idea. Adaptation aired on the Twilight Zone in the 60s.It seemed like this type of episode has been so many times before.
Before this episode aired in the early 90's, you had seen many times before a character's mind living a completely different yet fulfilling and fully complete life in the span of minutes?
I can't even think of a Twilight Zone that did this, and they did everything.
It's forty-five minutes of me watching Picard watch an uninteresting movie. It's so slow they had to interject the idiotic Riker scene cutting Picard off from the probe to give it any sense of urgency at all. Star Trek: Voyager did the same concept better, called Memorial.
I was quite digging the episode until the time came for the villagers to directly address Picard. That was just so jarring that it instantly took me out of the episode, and that its abruptness really interrupted the pace of the story itself. Yes, it's a 45 minute show, but having 40 minutes of goodness and 5 minutes of "We give up, let's just tell you now" is pretty uneven.
I was quite digging the episode until the time came for the villagers to directly address Picard. That was just so jarring that it instantly took me out of the episode, and that its abruptness really interrupted the pace of the story itself. Yes, it's a 45 minute show, but having 40 minutes of goodness and 5 minutes of "We give up, let's just tell you now" is pretty uneven.
This doesn't bother me, and it actually seems very realistic given the nature and purpose of the program itself.
The endangered race wanted someone to experience their civilization and society first-hand. But once the participant had done so, there was no need to prolong the charade.
Before the program ended, they wanted each of the 'characters' to deliver a personalized message to the active participant, one that displayed their race in the warmest and most endearing light.
That fit together very tightly, imo.
I feel like it should have been Picard who solved that mystery, instead of having the answer delivered to him in a handbasket. It's a Picard episode, the cleverest of the crew, and his archaeology skills could've been put to good use (what's an archaeologist who doesn't live in the past?). And above all else, having Picard solve the mystery gives him more agency, rather than just being a casual observer.
I've always thought that having the story interrupted by the bridge scenes were themselves pretty annoying. Picard's got a lifelong mystery on his hands, after all. Going with some of BillJ's comments about Riker, I'd rather that the episode only showed the crew at the beginning and end of the episode -- that way, more time could be devoted to smoothing out Kamin's life and the final revelation. Additionally, while the story sucks you in more and more about the life and times of Kamin and Co, the viewer wouldn't be cruelly pulled back to the status quo just yet. But by this point, TNG was pretty safe with its A & B plot structure that maybe the writers wrote it out of habit.
Because it's popular and highly-spoken of. Then when someone sees it for the first time, they'll be like "y'all built it up too much", or they'll compare it directly to expectations built from someone gushing and go "IT SUXX UGH".
All of this has happened before in SF/F fandom, and it will happen again.
As for Picard "returning to normal", I took it as the memories fading away rather quickly once he returns to consciousness. He didn't experience memories in realtime, remember. It might have seemed real but once he woke up, it's not inconceivable that his "normal" memories would instantly flood back. That said, he did take a long hard look at the turbolift doors before getting in, as if to say "Oh, I remember these things! Swish!".
With regards to keeping the mystery going, the bridge scenes served a practical purpose in hiding the gaps between every "time jump". You'll notice that the timeframe never jumps without the scene changing to the Enterprise bridge, and that every scene change results in a time jump. I thought it was quite neat. You do still get the "mystery" of whether it's all real, but only for the first ten minutes. I'm fine with that. The point of the story wasn't for Picard to solve the mystery; he gives that up quite early on.
The episode was tainted by the idiotic decision to let the viewer know something Picard does not - that its all fake and he's actually on the Enterprise bridge - way to take us out of the story. It would have had far more effect if we too had been questioning "is it real?" the whole time.
Why do some people seem to hate The Inner Light? I always thought it was an incredibly touching episode? And yet I've seen it described here as "a cure for insomnia". Why? Why is it so bad?
The man who made the first radio had people on horses riding by outside. First nuclear bomb used in war, was dropped from an airplane with propellers.I always found it a bit weird that a species only recently capable of launching space probes would have sufficient technology make a ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.