Is it just me, or does anyone else think that this is a sign of lazy writing? "We can't think of what so-and-so's father does, so let's just say they're in Starfleet. Even better, let's say they're an Admiral." It says to me that this happens a lot. A Star Trek show introduces a relative of a main character and, rather than come up with something creative about that relative, they just say this relative also works for Starfleet in some capacity and leave it at that. And for the most part, that doesn't really add a whole lot to the story. Troi's father didn't need to be a Starfleet officer for her backstory to work. Janeway's father didn't need to be a Starfleet admiral. Neither did Tom Paris's father have to be a Starfleet admiral, either.
This, incidentally, is one of the things I liked about DS9, particularly the Sisko's. Ben Sisko is in Starfleet, but his father is a chef while his son is a writer. Three generations of the same family, and they each did something completely different. Picard's family working a vineyard and disapproving of his joining Starfleet was also a nice addition to his character. Can you imagine how bland Picard's background would be if his father was also an admiral in Starfleet like Janeway/Paris/etc?
So I don't know. What do you all think of the tendency amongst Star Trek writers to make relatives of main cast members part of Starfleet, too?
This, incidentally, is one of the things I liked about DS9, particularly the Sisko's. Ben Sisko is in Starfleet, but his father is a chef while his son is a writer. Three generations of the same family, and they each did something completely different. Picard's family working a vineyard and disapproving of his joining Starfleet was also a nice addition to his character. Can you imagine how bland Picard's background would be if his father was also an admiral in Starfleet like Janeway/Paris/etc?
So I don't know. What do you all think of the tendency amongst Star Trek writers to make relatives of main cast members part of Starfleet, too?