It's some pretty awesome stuff if one has both patience and an open mind one can see in the sky.
Yes, you're so open minded that you've had multiple alien flybys of your house alone. Imagine the odds of that; crossing who knows how many light years just to fly past the same place over and over again. It's almost as if you're seeing what you want to see instead of seeing something and judging it with a skeptical mindset first before jumping to conclusions.
Oh course we all know there is no alien life, and objects that defy physics are easy to explain in nature.
It's incredibly arrogant to think that just because you can't explain something that that means it can't be explained.
Hold it RIGHT there.
I am not one of those folks who 'swallow nonsense", pal. you see, I have seen many things that conventional method can not explain. Also, I seen many structures with so many mathematical redundancies, and geometry, and spending years doing my own research, leads me to say there's something going on around here. And it's odd, you mention these guys have no evidence....but the conventional, mainstream has no evidence, either...which makes the conventional 'wide eyed bullshit' as well.
You do swallow nonsense.
J. threw out some wacky beliefs at random and managed to hit the mark on crap you believe in. I've thrown out random nonsense people believe in discussions with you before and managed to hit the mark on things you think are true. It comes across like you'll just believe anything as long as it's not the simplest and most logical explanation, because that's anathema to you.
Everyone has seen structures with "mathematical redundancies and geometry." They're called every building ever constructed. Don't try and sound deep.
The "conventional mainstream" has no evidence of what? The lack of frequent alien visitation to Earth? You do know that it's impossible to absolutely prove that that's never happened, right? That doesn't mean you can't draw a conclusion with a reasonable amount of certainty.
Well, seeing how we jumped in intelligence in a short time from sitting in caves, eating bananas and then in a short time supposedly building pyramids, somethings a bit odd...plus I don't believe they were built for the purpose of just sticking some dead guy in.
Of course not. They're landing pads for Goa'uld ships. Duh.
There was no jump in intelligence in a short time that led from humans being cave dwellers to building pyramids. There was thousands of years of changing climate, development of agriculture and domestication of animals, and new construction technologies and building techniques learned through communication and trial & error.
You can plainly see the long-term progression of pyramid advancement in Egypt over a period of centuries, moving from the flat-topped mastabas to stepped pyramids to the smooth-sided pyramids like at Giza. Furthermore, you can see similar progression in pyramid design at sites around the world from the US, Central and South America, Indonesia, India, China, and more. These are sites separated by thousands of miles and thousands of years that were built after decades or centuries of individual trial and error. They were not just handed the blueprints by some otherworldly visitor at the same time.
When you were a kid, did you ever try to build a house of cards? Which worked better, building straight upwards or building a stepped pyramid design? The stepped pyramid works because it's the most stable tall structure you can build using primitive materials and techniques. Did aliens have to tell you that, or did you figure it out on your own through trial and error?
It's human nature to want to see complexity in fairly simple and straightforward things, especially if you're ignorant of the history or science behind it. That's why you get people buying into Moon landing hoaxes, Kennedy assassination and 9/11 conspiracies, and thinking that their must have been some grand divine plan behind mankind's existence instead of it being a result of trial and error over millions of years thanks to evolution.
Well, considering that there are hieroglyphs showing what looks to be modern aircraft, and models of what looks like winged vehicles...and the former actually having been hidden behind a stone that was covering it, and only been known because said cover stone broke off.
Also, there's a south american picture depicting a ruler sitting in some conical shaped device, including controls, and what looks to be rocket exhaust at the bottom, it is interesting.
So looking at it from the perspective of a historian 3,000 years from now looking back at us, that must mean the starship Enterprise is real and flying around right now, because we've depicted it pictorially and in words.
People back then had imaginations too. People back then filled in the details of what they lacked in scientific knowledge with fantastical stories and drawings explaining things they didn't understand, much like you're doing now by concluding every UFO you see must be little green men.
Hell, when one sees odd structures on the moon, especially one that looks like a tetrahedral pyramid, I still want to know why have we not explored more of the moon, rather than merely spend 30 years in Earth orbit in the shuttles?
Because it's too expensive for too little gain at this point? But no, it's far easier to conclude that we just are afraid to find out about the structures left on the Moon by our little space friends, as if we haven't mapped and photographed the surface of the Moon extensively. Do you even think about your conspiracies before saying them? Why given the amount of money spent on SETI research would we deliberately avoid seeking out proof that we are not alone in the galaxy? Why would we avoid finding new alien technologies?
And, no offense, but you don't exactly strike me as a sensible, knowledgeable person, either. That's like feces telling vomit it stinks.
J. Allen is extremely sensible and knowledgeable, and quite frankly he's running circles around you in this debate, so cool it.