star trek 2013 villain possibilities

[matsuiny2004]

This is not new inforamtion

http://www.cinemaspy.com/movie-news...outline-plus-speculation-on-adversaries-7150/

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Seven month-old article is seven months old.

 

[matsuiny2004]

Seven month-old article is seven months old.

I know, I was just looking at the speculation of the writer. I was intrigues by the perspective and his ability to evaluate likelliness, not that it had new information. I did not post this in new trek info since it was not well obviously new inforamtion . My new stuff is in the new trek info thread.

 

[M'Sharak]

Seven month-old article is seven months old.

I know, I was just looking at the speculation of the writer. I was intrigues by the perspective and his ability to evaluate likelliness, not that it had new information. I did not post this in new trek info since it was not well obviously new inforamtion . My new stuff is in the new trek info thread.

matsuiny, this is the fourth thread you've started today to report what has turned out to be old news or old rumors. While I can appreciate that you're eager to share new details, it's also a good idea to make sure first that they are, in fact, new details before starting threads about them. (It's also a general rule that you should start no more than three new threads per day in a given forum, but you may not have been aware of that yet - now you know.)

New details are going to be a bit scarce, for the time being. Stop trying to force things and just wait until news happens, same as everyone else is doing. We'll all find out what there is to know when it's time to know it.

Closing this now.