Really? Their weapons aren't more powerful, and their ship aren't faster than the fastest Starfleet ship, and their shields are demonstrated to be weaker than Starfleet's right from the start.the Borg possess superior power generation capabilities compared to the Federation.
There no indication of this. Again, turbo or not, all the Empire has are "lasers." The Empire's main weapon is something the Federation left behind in favor of a superior weapon, the phaser.at some point a powerful enough laser will overwhelm the shield and power generation capabilities of the ship.
Other than they can be seen in a vacuum, how are they different? We can currently use lasers to destroy tanks and aircraft. The only thing preventing military deployment is making it (and it's power supply) mobile. This is apparently the only advantage the Empire has accomplished. Current lasers can impart heating and vibration upon rocks and cause them to explode. Big enough and the Death Star could do the same to a planet.SW's weapons don't behave like lasers and are called "turbolasers"
As much as I avoid SW vs. ST threads, they always turn into a giant honeypot,Really? Their weapons aren't more powerful, and their ship aren't faster than the fastest Starfleet ship, and their shields are demonstrated to be weaker than Starfleet's right from the start.the Borg possess superior power generation capabilities compared to the Federation.
Where are you getting better power generation by the Borg?
There no indication of this. Again, turbo or not, all the Empire has are "lasers." The Empire's main weapon is something the Federation left behind in favor of a superior weapon, the phaser.at some point a powerful enough laser will overwhelm the shield and power generation capabilities of the ship.
Other than they can be seen in a vacuum, how are they different? We can currently use lasers to destroy tanks and aircraft. The only thing preventing military deployment is making it (and it's power supply) mobile. This is apparently the only advantage the Empire has accomplished. Current lasers can impart heating and vibration upon rocks and cause them to explode. Big enough and the Death Star could do the same to a planet.SW's weapons don't behave like lasers and are called "turbolasers"
Likely if the Death Star were to fire it's main weapon at a Starship with raised shields there would be no effect. Because lasers are stopped by Starfleet shields.
Starfleet has a variation of a shield that will shield a ship literally inside of a star, so the direct heating effect of the Death Star's big laser isn't a threat, and the vibration effects of a laser would not reach the hull of the ship.
.
Really? Their weapons aren't more powerful, and their ship aren't faster than the fastest Starfleet ship, and their shields are demonstrated to be weaker than Starfleet's right from the start.the Borg possess superior power generation capabilities compared to the Federation.
Where are you getting better power generation by the Borg?
There no indication of this. Again, turbo or not, all the Empire has are "lasers." The Empire's main weapon is something the Federation left behind in favor of a superior weapon, the phaser.at some point a powerful enough laser will overwhelm the shield and power generation capabilities of the ship.
Other than they can be seen in a vacuum, how are they different? We can currently use lasers to destroy tanks and aircraft. The only thing preventing military deployment is making it (and it's power supply) mobile. This is apparently the only advantage the Empire has accomplished. Current lasers can impart heating and vibration upon rocks and cause them to explode. Big enough and the Death Star could do the same to a planet.SW's weapons don't behave like lasers and are called "turbolasers"
Likely if the Death Star were to fire it's main weapon at a Starship with raised shields there would be no effect. Because lasers are stopped by Starfleet shields.
Starfleet has a variation of a shield that will shield a ship literally inside of a star, so the direct heating effect of the Death Star's big laser isn't a threat, and the vibration effects of a laser would not reach the hull of the ship.
.
As much as I love B5, I have to disagree on one point. Unless Sheridan is in a Whitestar or the Excalibur, he isn't going to beat a Federation starship or an Emperial SD with an Omega class destroyer. Even I have no illusions there. Here's an interesting scenario though, Whitestar, with ace crew vs. Defiant with Sisko and company at the helm. Lots of wild manuevers insue.Captain Kirk and Captain Sheridan both beat he Empire in their respective ships
It's what they do, win in battle
Next Genny captains, no so much, maybe Sisko
The Enterprise isn't Starfleet's fastest ship, and the borg only gradually overtook her. Voyager and Prometheus are faster.The E-D was unable to outrun the Borg ship in the first encounter in "Q Who?"... and their ship aren't faster than the fastest Starfleet ship ...
Sure they do, the Genesis Device. Wipes the surface clean of enemy personnel and all installations. Leaves behind lush fields and pretty flowers. I'd imagine it would do the same to a Death Star.Does Starfleet field any weapons capable of damaging an entire star system (with the exception of blowing up a star) ?
Lasers can be turned on and off.SW turbolasers appear as bolts of energy over a short distance, not a continuous beam. That's not very laser-like.
And shields stop laser energy.Energy is energy and ...Likely if the Death Star were to fire it's main weapon at a Starship with raised shields there would be no effect. Because lasers are stopped by Starfleet shields.
And during the Klingon civil war, multiple Birds of Prey, with similar shield to regular Starfleet shields, flew low over the surface of a star. So standard shields can also handle extreme energy. When did we ever see (on screen) a Death Star fire for any duration?You're talking about the Metaphasic shieldStarfleet has a variation of a shield that will shield a ship literally inside of a star ...
In the movie Return of the Jedi, two small fighter, firing lasers, destroyed the bridge deflector emitter on a SSD. Using lasers. How can shields protect Imperial ships, when they can protect the emitters themselves from the tiny lasers on a "snub" fighter?How effective ST weapons are on SW shields
The Enterprise isn't Starfleet's fastest ship, and the borg only gradually overtook her. Voyager and Prometheus are faster.
Sure they do, the Genesis Device. Wipes the surface clean of enemy personnel and all installations. Leaves behind lush fields and pretty flowers. I'd imagine it would do the same to a Death Star.
Lasers can be turned on and off.
And shields stop laser energy.
And during the Klingon civil war, multiple Birds of Prey, with similar shield to regular Starfleet shields, flew low over the surface of a star. So standard shields can also handle extreme energy. When did we ever see (on screen) a Death Star fire for any duration?You're talking about the Metaphasic shield
In the movie Return of the Jedi, two small fighter, firing lasers, destroyed the bridge deflector emitter on a SSD. Using lasers. How can shields protect Imperial ships, when they can protect the emitters themselves from the tiny lasers on a "snub" fighter?How effective ST weapons are on SW shields
![]()
No.Well, the only reasonable way to ascertain which would win is to compare their offensive/defensive capabilities...
In the movie Return of the Jedi, two small fighter, firing lasers, destroyed the bridge deflector emitter on a SSD. Using lasers. How can shields protect Imperial ships, when they can protect the emitters themselves from the tiny lasers on a "snub" fighter?
![]()
Let's not forget that the Empire is an outgrowth of the Old Republic which stood as (at least) an interstellar organization for 25,000 years. The Federation is a small fraction as old and therefore has had a much more limited time to develop their tech. One might suppose that Imperial shield generators are orders of magnitude more strong than their Federation counterparts. And the SD's are not armed with lasers, but, rather, turbolasers which seem to be big fat cousins to blasters rather than lasers. Notice that they deliver a bolt of energy with lateral light emission as opposed to a laser which has no lateral emissions. It's been suggested that turbolasers are so called because a serious laser is involved in the guts of the thing to generate the blast. Turbolasers are not very accurate against small targets ("Their fighters are evading our turbolasers!") but the Enterprise is hardly a fighter.
Also, it seems like the Feds have no defense against Imperial ion cannon. The Breen used a similar weapon against the Feds during the Dominion War to devastating effect. Assuming an SSD is so equipped (And why wouldn't it be? The thing's frikkin' huge!) a sovvie wouldn't be up to the task.
So, E-E vs. Executer, Based on a technical review alone (who cares who is in command) in a head to head fight, the E could use torpedoes until it got smashed to pieces against the awesome hail of ion cannon and turbolaser (fatty blaster *not* lasers) fire. No doubt, there would be plenty of damage done to Vader's ship in the last moment's of Picard's, but I don't think there's a serious chance in a universe where it isn't a fight between protagonist and antagonist. Maybe some fancy footwork might even the odds (I wonder how effective the Picard Maneuver would be against an SSD?).
(Interestingly, I a wrote a short paper in college about this very subject and I concluded with that very supposition,; that the story forces would trump the military and technical considerations.)
--Alex
The Enterprise isn't Starfleet's fastest ship, and the borg only gradually overtook her. Voyager and Prometheus are faster.
How do we know Voyager and Prometheus are faster than a Borg cube? Which episode was that shown to be the case?
This is a thread I had in mind that deals with the question: Which starship would win in a battle?
The rule is: A poster puts 2 ships (they can be from Star Trek OR Star Wars) against each other. After discussing the outcome, it is someone else's turn to do so!
I will chose one first:
Sovereign-Class starship Vs. Executor-Class Super Star Destroyer... (Ex. Vader's Flagship, or the Lusankya).
The Enterprise isn't Starfleet's fastest ship, and the borg only gradually overtook her. Voyager and Prometheus are faster.
How do we know Voyager and Prometheus are faster than a Borg cube? Which episode was that shown to be the case?
That would be "Caretaker" the pilot episode of Voyager, and "Message in a Bottle" respectively.
The E-D was clocked by Geordi at Warp 9.65 without any external help while running from the Borg in "Q-Who".
In the dialogue of "Caretaker" Lt. Stadi said that Voyager was capable of Warp 9.975.
Dialogue in "Message in a Bottle" says that the USS Prometheus was the fastest starship in the fleet with a crusing speed (not her emergency speed, mind you) of Warp 9.9. Certain non-canon souces attribute a top speed to about Warp 9.99.
The Borg Cube in "Q-Who" and "The Best of Both Worlds" never exceeds Warp 9.7.
Hey, a fellow anime fan. I loved Gunbuster and Diebuster and yes the Exelion could give a SD quite a run for it's money, throw in the Gunbuster mecha and well... bad news for the SD. I always wondered how some of the other ships from anime would fair against ST/SW starships, ones like the SDF Macross or the later New Macross Class Battlecarriers or the much revered Yamato from Space Battleship Yamato. It would be interesting to see how ST/SW shields faired against the wave motion cannon or the macross cannon or how the pin-point/omnidirectional barrier on the Macross ships faired against phasers/turbolasers, I can't remember if the Yamato had shields or not, if not it would be at a lethal disadvantage.blah... the trek/wars debate is always tiring. it always boils down to how "ubur powerful" the wars weapons are. on another forum site it ended up being called "the gigaton debate".
at any rate i realy don't have anything new to contribute to this old debate so i'm going to offer another ship vs.
from an old anime "gunbuster" there's a ship called the "Exelion" it's 7,205 meters long, 2,295 meters wide, and 1,680 meters high. has a crew of 25,000 and carries 1,200 mecha and 880 fighters. its weapons include approx. 756 laser cannons (can't confirm the exact number) at least 45 photon torpedo silos (cannot confirm exact number, only approx #) its ftl capabilities are like a primitive version of wars ships that allow it to jump up to 3000 parsecs at a time. its engines are also able to accelerate the ship to light speed, although it suffers from the rip van wrinkle effect. i'd think it would give a typical star destroyer a run for its money.
I'll take Dr. Manhattan vs. your best Starship.
If you're opening this up to non-on screen material, then the original Star Trek Maps explain that there was a "Cochrane Factor" multiplier which is applied to warp factors, so TOS era starships were actual moving at several hundred thousand times light-speed.The Star Trek Encyclopedia lists the normal maximum for a Starfleet vessel as warp 9.2 at a slick 1,649x the speed of light. Bear in mind this is a dash speed, not a cruising speed. But a ship in hyperspace moves at millions of times the speed of light.
It occurs to me that claims of the speed of the SW ship is base of the size of our galaxy. But the size of the galaxy "far far away" is a unknown. All we know from on screen evidence is that it's a spiral galaxy.Travel from Coruscant to any planet in the Outer Rim seems to be matters of hours, not weeks.
Problem there is, there's no on screen indication as to how powerful those SW weapons are. We've seen the power of the Death Star to blow up a planet, and we're told that the Death Star's firepower is equivalent to fifty percent of the firepower of all the other ships in the imperial fleet combined.it always boils down to how "ubur powerful" the wars weapons are.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.