• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Dark Knight Rises Anticipation Station

According to Blastr, a British newspaper called The Surrey Comet has revealed that an 8 year old actress named Leilah De Meza was offered the role of
Young Talia al Ghul. The articles goes on to say that her parents turned it down when they found out she would have to shave her head. It also says that a 12 year old actress named Joey King is playing an unknown role, which they guess might be the Young Talia role which was offered the De Meza.
 
They said the same thing at blastr.
I'm wondering if maybe we'll get flashbacks to different points in her life. That would be a good explanation as to why we also had the young Ra's Al Ghul stories a while back.
 
According to Blastr, a British newspaper called The Surrey Comet has revealed that an 8 year old actress named Leilah De Meza was offered the role of
Young Talia al Ghul. The articles goes on to say that her parents turned it down when they found out she would have to shave her head. It also says that a 12 year old actress named Joey King is playing an unknown role, which they guess might be the Young Talia role which was offered the De Meza.

If this is true, then is
Marion Cotillard a liar? People have been speculating for the longest time that her character is actually Talia, and Miranda Tate is just a cover name. She's been denying it though. It would certainly fit, especially with Liam Neeson returning.
 
Hmmm, not sure. Maybe there's some kind of loophole that she's using so she's not lying?
 
Not a liar...misdirecting us for the sake of preserving a plot secret maybe. Remember as we've discussed before this has happened in "Batman Begins" with Ken Wannatabe and Liam Neeson. Can't remember how the two of them handled the press questions about their characters but I think the twist regarding their secret was contained well until the movie's premiered. Unless you were one who read the leaked script you probably wouldn't have known about it until you saw the movie.

It's also very possible that Marion didn't know about her character until she started to film her part. I remember when she was first cast that the question regarding Talia came up on a red carpet event before filming started and she first said no. So this could have changed during production. It's not really a big deal if they're trying to preserve a plot twist.
 
Nolan talks Bane and the 8 year jump here http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=85075

"I didn't know him very well," says Nolan of the comic book iteration of Bane. "David Goyer got me a bunch of stuff on him and we looked into him. I only knew him by name, I wasn't familiar with his back story. He's a very cool character. And getting an actor like Tom to take it on, you know you're going to get something very special. Tom is somebody who really knows how to put character into every gesture, every aspect of his physicality in the way that great actors can... With Bane, the physicality is the thing. With a good villain you need an archetype, you know, you need the extreme of some type of villainy. The Joker is obviously a particular archetype of diabolical, chaotic anarchy and has a devilish sense of humor. Bane, to me, is something we haven't dealt with in the films. We wanted to do something very different in this film. He's a primarily physical villain, he's a classic movie monster in a way but with a terrific brain. I think he's a fascinating character. I think people are going to get a kick out of what we've done with him."

"It will make a lot more sense to people when they see the film," Nolan explains. "But it's not a great mystery, it's the jumping-off point for the film, but it's hard for me to articulate it. I think the mood at the beginning of the film will make a lot of sense. If I had to express it thematically, I think what we're saying is that for Batman and Commissioner Gordon, there's a big sacrifice, a big compromise, at the end of the 'The Dark Knight' and for that to mean something, that sacrifice has to work and Gotham has to get better in a sense. They have to achieve something for the ending of that film and the feeling at the end of that film to have validity. Their sacrifice has to have meaning and it takes time to establish that and to show that, and that's the primary reason we did that. It's a time period that is not so far ahead that we would have to do crazy makeup or anything, which I think would be distracting, but it gave them something to get their teeth into, particularly Christian in terms of [portraying] this guy who has been frozen in this moment in time with nowhere to go. He really has done an incredible job figuring out how to characterize that and express that."
 
I'm sure we'll hear from Jackson Archer at some point tonight or tomorrow. He's seeing the prologue. :)


Infiltration, theatrics and deception are traits we know the League of Shadows know very well indeed. I should note as well that Talia was in Denny O'Neil's novelization of "Batman Begins". Ra's writes to her about Bruce while she's studying in Paris I believe.
 
In the meantime, check out this leaked footage. Perhaps Batman does get his back broken?
That is one of the nuttiest things I've ever seen. What the hell was he thinking trying to pick a fight (or so it seems) while dressed in the outfit? Unless you know for certain you can lay someone out with ease then you shouldn't be antagonizing anyone. And dressed in costume it's going to be doubly embarrassing if you get your ass handed to you like this guy does.
 
The preview, which I saw this morning, is hugely ambitious and technically outstanding, and culminates in a stunt the like of which I’ve never seen before. But there’s one enormous problem with it, and it’s going to overshadow any amount of excitement the sequence will otherwise generate. Tom Hardy’s dialogue is almost completely unintelligible.

Throughout the sequence, Bane makes clear the details of his nefarious plot – or, rather, he would have done if he didn’t sound like he was chewing on a pair of socks at the same time. Amid all the spluttering, I just about caught that it involves a “Dr Pawel” and something to do with blood.

Naturally, the only talking point – or mumbling point – on the way out was if anyone had understood what on earth Bane was saying. (Nobody had.) This kind of buzz can only be counterproductive: thousands of cinema-goers who see the footage over the next few weeks will now think of Nolan’s next film as “that one where you can’t understand what the bad guy says”.

Spoilers at the link:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...impressive-stunt-and-an-enormous-problem.html
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top