• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The OFFICIAL STNG-R general discussion thread!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Model work of 1987 compared to CGI work of 2011?

If only we'd got the chance to see how wrong your "cheap" comment is, but ironically CBS were the ones too "cheap" to prove that point ARF ARF!

We did see it. It's called TOS-R, and all of the space shots look like garbage.
 
Just watched the sample video clips...never noticed before that the space jellyfish are bluish and...pinkish. Boy comes to save girl. Ugh.
 
Model work of 1987 compared to CGI work of 2011?

If only we'd got the chance to see how wrong your "cheap" comment is, but ironically CBS were the ones too "cheap" to prove that point ARF ARF!

We did see it. It's called TOS-R, and all of the space shots look like garbage.


No, they look like they fit in with the look of the show. You can't have it look like the nuBSG effects in a 1960s tv series.


-Chris
 
No, they look like they fit in with the look of the show. You can't have it look like the nuBSG effects in a 1960s tv series.
-Chris

Not really. It looked more like rushed CGI to be honest.

Very few of the episodes maintained a 60's aesthetic look...space seed is definitely an exception. If all of CBS Digitals work had turned out like that, TOS-R would have consistently looked great.

The quality of the CGI went up and down from episode to episode. Sometimes it hit the mark, like space seed, and sometimes it looked like a scene from one of the movies with the lighting and camera work. Those latter shots didn't fit the look of the show.

They weren't aiming for the same type of thing someoone like Daren Doctorman was trying to achieve, they missed that mark by a mile.
 
Thank you very much, TheSeeker! The sort of approach in the .avi depicting apples to apples comparison of the Miri stock footage would have been infinitely preferable to what we got in the end. :techman:
 
Thank you very much, TheSeeker! The sort of approach in the .avi depicting apples to apples comparison of the Miri stock footage would have been infinitely preferable to what we got in the end. :techman:
They were the company that wanted to replace aliens as well...so would it really be worth it if you had to put up with that awful Gorn they came up with?
 
Thank you very much, TheSeeker! The sort of approach in the .avi depicting apples to apples comparison of the Miri stock footage would have been infinitely preferable to what we got in the end. :techman:
They were the company that wanted to replace aliens as well...so would it really be worth it if you had to put up with that awful Gorn they came up with?
Replacing the aliens like that would have been really bad. Also, when I said that "the sort of approach" depicted in that .avi would have been much better, I didn't say or mean they should have been the ones to do the FX either, necessarily.
 
Even if they had gotten the job they still wouldn't have had any say in whether aliens got replaced or not.
 
Model work of 1987 compared to CGI work of 2011?

If only we'd got the chance to see how wrong your "cheap" comment is, but ironically CBS were the ones too "cheap" to prove that point ARF ARF!

We did see it. It's called TOS-R, and all of the space shots look like garbage.


Ridiculous, such a sweeping statement isn't even worth considering and bears no resemblance to reality whatsoever.

RAMA
 
While I do like what we have seen, remember that ILM is the only post production work that was given much time (pilots having a longer then typical episode post production time frame), in fact the day to fay tv episodes couldn't keep up, they kept expanding the personnel and changed production models to help speed up the time process.

I'm still worried the 4-foot model will not be up to the quality of the ILM images, but if Inner light has any of the newer FX (and I'd have to watch it to recollect if it did) we will find out soon enough. I'm willing to bet after the learning experience of the sample, they will apply whatthey need to do for the box set...this may include adding more CGI shots.

As for winning awards for visual FX please remember this is 1987 and up, there wasn't what you would call much in the way of competition.
The opposite is in fact true...the categories back then included ALL TV productions, including mini-series and TV movies that had much bigger budgets, in this climate, the fact STNG did so well is quite a tribute. Starting in 1998, the Academy of TV Arts and Sciences split the category between the higher budget minis and tv movies, so tv shows would have their own award. Add to this Greg Jein built many models on STNG, and he was a multiple Oscar nominee and winner(including one of my favorites, the interstellar chandelier from Close Encounters). They couldn't have hired a better model maker.

Not to say some of the later ship work wasn't handled well (Some absolutely was), but a lot was also rushed to complete.
Um...how is this different than any other TV show with FX from the pre-CGI proliferation era?? From the first season on there were time crunches.

And even I admit that I am sick to death of reused ship shots, after seeing some literally over a hundred times....
This was expanded with the 4-foot model, which few people seem happy with. It remains to be seen how much work will go into adding a few shots for variety's sake.

Now on to the comparison between ENT CGI NCC-1701D, you actually shouldn't be comparing it to any of the remastered footage so far, because that wasn't the material that ENT was working from. Its the 4ft model that they duplicated many shots, and so far, we don't have a single frame yet to make any rational comparisons with.

Even using the same model shots, I wouldn't mind seeing them actually attempt to better capture they correct scale as TNG could be absolutely awful about this (see Defector a some glaring examples). That I would think they could work on with the footage they do have.
I actually prefer the better CGI models of the E-D from different sources, the best being one not even used in the series. I understand why they are not switching to CGI, and I'm generally ok with it, most of the footage so far is great.

My biggest issue with STNG FX is the the scale!! This is one area I'd have liked changed above all else.

ABout the ENT model in TATV, gabriel says this:

A look at the new Enterprise-D... | Report this post to moderator
By: GabrielCKoerner (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 15:10:58 on May 09, 2005 | (1)
Welp, I've been authorized to release a few beauty stills of the new Enterprise-D CG model I created for the finale, "These Are the Voyages". Hats off to Benjamin Burnett, who helped me in a pinch and painted all the engineering hull textures. I modeled it and textured the saucer and nacelles.

It took some liberties. As many know there were two miniatures: The initial ILM smooth 6 footer (which in my opinion was the more graceful of the two) and the chunkier, thicker paneled 4 footer.

I gave it the lines of the 6 footer, about half the thickness of the paneling from the 4 footer, the thicker lifeboat hatches of the 4 footer, and the shinier highlights of the Generations repaint.

A notable difference is that because of constraints in the model the lights on the rim of the saucer were never seen lit, this is the first time that they are.

I hope I got it right. This really was a labor of love... with a check attached. :)

So he used both models, but the lines of the 6 footer.
 
Two more comparisons. Like before, the TNG remastered shots come courtesy of trekcore.com.

JellyfishlifeformEncounteratFarpoint.jpg

JellyfishlifeformEncounteratFarpointremastered.jpg


KataanprobeInnerlight.jpg

KataanprobeInnerlightremastered.jpg
 
The Jellyfish is so amazing. All that detail got totally lost in the original run? Or is the new one a CG enhancement?
 
NTSC - Not The Same Color!

But that old TrekCore screen cap I linked to does not show pink and blue space jellyfish, right? Although, I guess it could be a little pinkish.
 
Two more comparisons. Like before, the TNG remastered shots come courtesy of trekcore.com.

JellyfishlifeformEncounteratFarpoint.jpg

JellyfishlifeformEncounteratFarpointremastered.jpg


KataanprobeInnerlight.jpg

KataanprobeInnerlightremastered.jpg


My guess...there was a lot of detail unseen because of poor quality in the old version, but I would guess they enhanced it subtley as well.
 
While I do like what we have seen, remember that ILM is the only post production work that was given much time (pilots having a longer then typical episode post production time frame), in fact the day to fay tv episodes couldn't keep up, they kept expanding the personnel and changed production models to help speed up the time process.

I'm still worried the 4-foot model will not be up to the quality of the ILM images, but if Inner light has any of the newer FX (and I'd have to watch it to recollect if it did) we will find out soon enough. I'm willing to bet after the learning experience of the sample, they will apply whatthey need to do for the box set...this may include adding more CGI shots.

IIRC I don't think The Inner light has any exterior FX at all, I think all the money was thrown at the alien village set and all of the shots of the probe were from the viewscreen.
It might even explode at one point IIRC, but again that is shown from the viewscreen.

All you're going to get, exterior space wise is a bog standard stock shot of the 6ft model dropping out of warp and leaving again at the end of the ep....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top