Either you're joking or you never watched an episode of Star Trek.But the series didn't make such a big deal about what an "amazing leader" Kirk was.
Yeah, let's go down the list--
TOS:
-one of the youngest captains in Starfleet history at age 31
-made first contact with the First Federation, the Gorn, the Metrons, to name a few
-discovered the first silicon lifeform
-had the largest file of temporal prime directive violations by the 2370s, usually in the line of duty
TOS movies:
-At 36-37, became admiral (which is pretty darn young)
-prevented Genesis from being used as an offensive weapon of mass destruction
-saved the Earth from the Whale Probe
-prevented interstellar war with the Klingons, ushering decades of peace
Really, even going only by the fact that he was one of the youngest captains ever and then very soon after became one of the youngest admirals ever says plenty about his leadership skills. For a show that supposedly doesn't talk about his abilities, the writers gave Kirk an extraordinary amount of feats that made him a living legend. You might be confusing Kirk with the Enterprise -- the show hyped up Kirk, but nothing was ever said about the Enterprise being the flagship or a ship of exceptional importance. Advanced yes, but not the kind of hero status that the NX-01, Enterprise-D, or even the Defiant had.
And lastly, if Kirk wasn't considered an extraordinary leader by TOS standards, just why would Old Spock ever take such a huge gamble on New Kirk? Because of more "dumb luck?" There's a difference between plot contrivance and the actual actions of the main characters here. Old Spock didn't predict New Kirk would get beamed into Nero's bridge or would be held over a ledge, but Old Spock predicted how New Spock would act under the circumstances. He knew Kirk would be capable of manipulating Quinto Spock; let's remember that Old Spock knows full well that his best friend manipulated the Kobayashi Maru, outwitted advanced AIs on several occasions, and has gotten the better of Spock and McCoy plenty of times in the Prime Universe. And Shatner Kirk also had his string of luck too: the Gary Mitchell fight, the Tholian Web, any given guard who just happened to look the other way, thereby allowing Kirk to judo chop him for a quick escape, and heck, the entire escape from Planet Genesis (arguably the biggest example of sheer luck in the entire franchise -- and completely and extraordinarily heroic given the epic scale and saving Spock).
Also of note, Nimoy Spock's faith in Shatner-Kirk's dashing heroism was humorously lampshaded in TUC, when Spock said that if he knew Kirk well enough, Kirk would already be successfully carrying out an escape plan from Rura Penthe. Cut to Kirk getting his butt kicked in a jail fight, but the point is: such a joke would only work IF Kirk had the kind of heroic reputation that you say Shatner-Kirk doesn't have.
It's almost as if Pine-Kirk is being held on a different, and probably tougher standard than Shatner Kirk; seeing as how one is in his twenties and out of the academy, and the other in his 30s and beyond with a longer and more impressive resume of feats, that doesn't seem rather fair (unless it is, of course, to bash the movie in any way shape or form imaginable). Believable for TOS/TNG, but somehow not okay for this movie in particular.
What I said was they don't make a big deal about Kirk's heroism, like oldSpock does when he insists on sending Kirk and Scott alone to the enterprise. Logically, oldSpock should go with them, among other reasons, to give tactical information about Nero's ship, and to help convince nuSpock to go along with the plan to stop Nero (living proof of the time travel would have gone a long way). But instead, Spock is so overwhelmingly confident in Kirk's leadership that he stays behind. Considering how Kirk has been portrayed as a reckless lunatic that's lucky he's still alive, this makes no sense whatsoever, and makes it seem like Spock is simply reading the script.
The current state of this thread:
![]()
Well, yeah they sure did in TOS and Kirk was certainly just as reckless. The reason Old Spock didn't come along with NuKirk is explained in the film by Old Spock!!!
Basically if you were paying attention you would know this from watching the film. The math on this one isn't terribly hard for those who don't need everything spoonfed to them or handed on a silver lens flare platter.
Calling NuKirk a reckless lunatic is your perception. So if that is how you see it then no wonder you feel the way you do. OldSpock is overwhelmingly confident in Kirk's leadership because he has experienced it first hand for years so it is logical from OldSpock's perception that NuKirk is capable of displaying the same leadership qualities.
Also, remember, the way you're seeing it isn't the way the OldSpock character sees it. You seem to fall under the premise that OldSpock should be seeing it the way you do.
I'm under the premise that oldSpock, being Vulcan and all, should be using logic to make his decisions. He doesn't seem very logical to me.
Sure it was.. Spock got Kirk back in the game because he knows what Kirk is capable of in either reality. Nero also talks about how great Kirk was. This is the same Kirk just younger in a different reality. At the core they're both the same.Well, yeah they sure did in TOS and Kirk was certainly just as reckless. The reason Old Spock didn't come along with NuKirk is explained in the film by Old Spock!!!
Basically if you were paying attention you would know this from watching the film. The math on this one isn't terribly hard for those who don't need everything spoonfed to them or handed on a silver lens flare platter.
IIRC the "explanation" had something to do with depriving nuKirk and nuSpock of their friendship, as if that were more important that the billions of lives at stake (but that's already been covered in Plot Hole City Part 2). Nothing was explained about why Kirk was so great.
Space Therapist beat me to it.Calling NuKirk a reckless lunatic is your perception. So if that is how you see it then no wonder you feel the way you do. OldSpock is overwhelmingly confident in Kirk's leadership because he has experienced it first hand for years so it is logical from OldSpock's perception that NuKirk is capable of displaying the same leadership qualities.
Also, remember, the way you're seeing it isn't the way the OldSpock character sees it. You seem to fall under the premise that OldSpock should be seeing it the way you do.
I'm under the premise that oldSpock, being Vulcan and all, should be using logic to make his decisions. He doesn't seem very logical to me.
This.I'm under the premise that oldSpock, being Vulcan and all, should be using logic to make his decisions. He doesn't seem very logical to me.
Haven't you been following all the movies? From the motion picture to Undiscovered Country showed OldSpock embracing his human self and integrating that into his personality. He even tells NuSpock to follow his heart.
Because of his understanding of a lifelong friend and his own "human" nature.Spock admitted that the reason he gave Kirk were basically lies. He decided that Kirks friendship with Spock was worth the chance that Nero could destroy Earth as well if they didn't work together.
Bingo. Having oldSpock take a purely logical approach only works if one disregards much of the character arc for Spock which extends from the the Original Series through the feature films and into the S5 TNG "Unification" episodes. While it might be possible to make a case for Spock being over-emotional in the 2009 film, it can't be denied that the character had been heading away from pure logic and toward embrace of his emotional side for quite some time as a result of his own deliberate choice, logically arrived-at.I'm under the premise that oldSpock, being Vulcan and all, should be using logic to make his decisions. He doesn't seem very logical to me.
Haven't you been following all the movies? From the motion picture to Undiscovered Country showed OldSpock embracing his human self and integrating that into his personality. He even tells NuSpock to follow his heart.
Where do you see that happening?An emotion journey that took Spock Prime decades his younger self accomplishes in the space of a few days?
Which doesn't tell me a thing about where in the movie you saw nuSpock accomplishing "in the space of a few days" the same "emotion journey" it took oldSpock decades to complete. You've more or less repeated your previous contention, adding nothing new.Giving up his primary reliance on logic and embracing his human half? It too old Spock three seasons and a movie to begin to do that. NuSpock has everyone telling him to abandon logic and eventually he does, simply going where others send him.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.