J.J. - if you are reading this, then please...NO MORE LENS FLARE!!
There are two camps. You may choose only one:
A) I enjoyed the [movie / episode / story], so the [plot hole / inconsistency / bad science] didn't really bother me that much.
...or...
B) I did not enjoy the [movie / episode / story], so the [plot hole / inconsistency / bad science] ruined the entire movie for me.
Camp B thinks it was the [plot hole / inconsistency / bad science] that ruined the [movie / episode / story], but that's not the real reason. The real reason is that the [movie / episode / story] failed to engage the individual viewer to the point where their suspension of disbelief rationalized away any potential 'flaws.'
Once you are in a camp, your decision has been made, and you will not be swayed. That is because the [plot hole / inconsistency / bad science] is not really the problem, so no amount of discussing the [plot hole / inconsistency / bad science] will ever make any difference.
You either enjoyed the [movie / episode / story] or you didn't. The rest follows naturally.
Copyright 2011 by Samuel T. Cogley. All posts are the property of the poster.
There you have it. Teh internets has been explained.
I do have high hopes for J.J Abrams next Star Trek film. Now that he has successfully established his Star Trek first film & I feel that going forward he will really have the freedom to explore creativity with Star Trek in a way in which he wasn’t able to with his first film.
With his first film his hands were sort of tied & his freedom to have fully creativity was limited since he had to be careful of dealing with the issue for the growing pains that are to be expected when updating or revisiting a classic. Now that these issues have already been dealt with it opens up many more avenues for him to explore in terms of new stories, character development, the chance for him to create new introduce new content, and explore new concepts which will add to the Legacy of Star Trek.
I do hope that this will be the beginning of many new compelling stories & adventures for Captain Kirk & has crew as well as all for all of Star Trek.
the time setting of the next movie is at least advanced into the first season time period of TOS - no "pre-TOS, just commissioned" stories about this crew.
They should have TrekBBS as their script and story consultant!!
the time setting of the next movie is at least advanced into the first season time period of TOS - no "pre-TOS, just commissioned" stories about this crew.
So bitch-sessions about this film can include the entire film as implausible because we haven't established how Kirk became a mature Captain.
I prefer this approach too, we got to see them thrown together initially at the very beginning of their adventures, now we jump ahead to the more familiar era with them well established as a crew.^ Squeeee!![]()
They should have TrekBBS as their script and story consultant!!
This. Fans always know best. Remember the BringBackKirk movement. I can't believe TPTB never bought into it! It would have been gold!!!
Wow, I just checked out that site. What ********ness.
"We can't stress enough that the ratings will be maximized by the return of James T. Kirk!"![]()
Wow, I just checked out that site. What ********ness.
"We can't stress enough that the ratings will be maximized by the return of James T. Kirk!"![]()
So Paramount actually listened to them?
Wow, I just checked out that site. What ********ness.
"We can't stress enough that the ratings will be maximized by the return of James T. Kirk!"![]()
So Paramount actually listened to them?
Yes, even more literally than the BringBackKirk people could ever have expected.
Paramount brought back James T. Kirk...
...and too late, the BBK folks realized that they should have called themselves Bring Back Shatner.![]()
Depending on whether or not they liked the movie, that's a twist ending worthy of the Twilight Zone![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.