• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Novelizations

nothinglikesun

Ensign
Newbie
Regarding the original series Bantam novelizations by James Blish, does anyone know who commissioned these?

Did Bantam approach Paramount, or did Paramount approach Bantam? Or was it something else entirely.

Thank-you.
 
^Well, at the time when the first Blish novelization would've been written, Paramount hadn't yet bought Desilu, so it would've had to be a licensing deal between Bantam and Desilu. Novelizations of TV series were pretty common at the time, even more so than today (perhaps because TV sets weren't so ubiquitous and there were few reruns), so it might've been pretty routine for a studio and a publisher to make a tie-in deal for a new show. I'm not sure who would've initiated the deal, but at the time ST began, Desilu was considered a washed-up studio, with nothing in production beyond The Lucy Show; commissioning Star Trek and Mission: Impossible (and later Mannix) was part of a strategy to rebuild Desilu into a force to be reckoned with. So I'd guess they would've probably been the ones to approach publishers about tie-ins to help promote their shows. But I could be wrong.

And Bantam wasn't the only licensee. They got the license for the novelizations and published the first one in 1967, but the following year we got the young-adult Mission to Horatius from Whitman Books and the nonfiction The Making of Star Trek from Ballantine (which went on to publish other ST nonfiction/behind-the-scenes books in later years, as well as the TAS adaptations by Alan Dean Foster, all while Bantam retained the license for TOS fiction).
 
Regarding the original series Bantam novelizations by James Blish, does anyone know who commissioned these?

"Frederik Pohl was the editor at Bantam Books in the late 70s, and was looking for writers to create Star Trek novels..." says Stephen Goldin at:
http://stephengoldin.com/madworld.html

Did Bantam approach Paramount, or did Paramount approach Bantam?
I seem to recall some details appeared in "Voyages of Imagination" by Jeff Ayers. Whitman had already done "Mission to Horatius", aimed at children. Bantam's line skewed a little higher and the books matched other science fiction paperbacks being released by Bantam at the time. "Spock Must Die!" came about because Blish's adaptations were so popular.
http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Star_Trek_%28Bantam%29
 
^Yeah, but I think the question is how the adaptations themselves came about. Novelizations, not original novels. Horatius didn't come out until a year after the first Blish volume.
 
^Yeah, but I think the question is how the adaptations themselves came about. Novelizations, not original novels.

I don't have my "Voyages of Imagination" on hand. Was in not that collections of short stories of "The Twilight Zone" had sold well, and Frederik Pohl was shopping around for something similar?
 
Pohl wasn't at Bantam yet, he was editing a couple of SF magazines. But yeah, the success of the Twilight Zone books for Bantam had to be a major factor, whoever the editor was at the time.
 
Does anyone know why Ballantine got the animated license for the novelizations, and not Bantam?

I think it's simply that TAS was a separate show, so the rights were negotiated separately. When TAS came along in 1973, Bantam already had the rights to publish fiction based on the original series, but that didn't automatically give them the rights to do the same for the animated series. Ballantine (which already had the ST nonfiction rights) was free to compete for the license, and they must've simply made a better offer than Bantam did.

It's similar to how Malibu Comics got the rights to DS9 even though DC had the rights to TOS & TNG. It all may look like one franchise, but each show is a separate entity from a legal standpoint so the rights are negotiated separately. Pocket has gotten the rights to all the Trek series since 1980 or so, but I don't think that's automatic. I think they're negotiated for separately, but Pocket kept getting them because it's known and trusted for its experience with media tie-ins, and perhaps because it's owned by the same conglomerate as Paramount/CBS.
 
I could be wrong, but I think Pocket outbid them for the license.

Yep, but just before their license ran out, the Bantam team noticed a loophole that any manuscripts in the production line would still be permitted to get a release, despite being after the end date, so they they quickly shuffled through as many as possible - and then Pocket had to delay "The Entropy Effect" until all the remaining Bantams (and "Star Trek Maps") came out. Originally, TEE was scheduled to come out just after the novelization of TMP.
 
^Yup, and because of that, we got David Gerrold's classic The Galactic Whirlpool and the wonderful ST Maps. On the other hand, we also got Perry's Planet and Death's Angel. Though if those were rushed into publication, that might explain a few things...
 
A bit of topic, but I was curious about KILLING TIME by Della Van Hise. Did she really think her first draft would be published (I know it was, but it appears to be accidental).
 
A bit of topic, but I was curious about KILLING TIME by Della Van Hise. Did she really think her first draft would be published (I know it was, but it appears to be accidental).

Well, I doubt it was the first draft, but I get what you mean. I think its "slash" content has been blown out of proportion in fan mythology; I gather it was more innuendo than anything else. I'm pretty sure I used to have that edition of the book, and I never even noticed any slash subtext at the time.
 
I'm pretty sure I used to have that edition of the book, and I never even noticed any slash subtext at the time.

I still do have a copy - there's very little difference - but the reason some people noticed the novel was a bit slashy (but no more slashy than the homoerotic aspects of Marshak/Culbreath's "Phoenix" novels, or "Triangle"), was that Ms Van Hise had a high profile in amateur fanzine circles, and had published several high-profile K/S stories. Her avid fans were already sweating on finding the hidden subtext in "Killing Time" before its release. It just turned out to be less hidden then some expected.
 
I read Killing Time when it came out and have re-read it since, and I've never noticed anything particularly "slashy' (can this be a word now? oh please) about it. The Marshak/Culbreath stuff is far worse in that regard, I think.
 
^Yup, and because of that, we got David Gerrold's classic The Galactic Whirlpool and the wonderful ST Maps.

Two of my favorite printed Trek items ever. Would love to see more Trek novels from Mr. Gerrold at some point (though I know that we most likely will not). Sadly, my copy of Maps is starting to show it's age, and I keep them safely in their folder nowadays. Beautiful piece of work, though. Especially considering that all the layout had to be done without computer aid back then.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top