^It's something a lot of people are assuming, but the only thing that's been officially said is a shorter run in 2012, which could mean 6/7, or 4/5, or 8/9, or...
Do I need to tell you that you can ignore the Private Eye story? No? Good! I look forward to this being called a rant.
Whya re we all of a sudden speaking of 5 episodes? Wasn't 6 or 7 announced for 2012 already, or was that something I assumed when they said "split season again"
Pretty much nothing has been said or confirmed.Whya re we all of a sudden speaking of 5 episodes? Wasn't 6 or 7 announced for 2012 already, or was that something I assumed when they said "split season again"
Whya re we all of a sudden speaking of 5 episodes? Wasn't 6 or 7 announced for 2012 already, or was that something I assumed when they said "split season again"
Ah....Yea, I went back and checked the "Bad News for 2012" thread wondering how I misremembered, and realized it was you who led me down that trailWhya re we all of a sudden speaking of 5 episodes? Wasn't 6 or 7 announced for 2012 already, or was that something I assumed when they said "split season again"
It's largely assumed, and, from my POV, I asked around with some contacts and was told season 7 is budgeted as two 7-episode sets, and that it's logical that that's how they'll be aired also.
That's totally unofficial, of course - I'm not involved in DW these days.
The Moff tweeted:
Do I need to tell you that you can ignore the Private Eye story? No? Good! I look forward to this being called a rant.
I think he gets quite a bit of (undeserved, IMO) flak via twitter.The Moff tweeted:
Do I need to tell you that you can ignore the Private Eye story? No? Good! I look forward to this being called a rant.
It's like he's a full fledged board member lol
I think he gets quite a bit of (undeserved, IMO) flak via twitter.
The Moff tweeted:
Do I need to tell you that you can ignore the Private Eye story? No? Good! I look forward to this being called a rant.
As angry Who fans bombarded the Eye with online demands that we issue an 'apology and retraction', showrunner Seven Moffat went on to the offensive. "Private Eye seems like such fun until it's YOUR friends they spreading nasty, inaccurate gossip about. How Horrible," he tweeted the following morning. Which bits of the story he considered inaccurate, he would not say.
Two days later, the BBC News website gave him one hell of a bounce, publishing a story with copious quotes from Cohen, putting the full blame on Moffat for the fact that there will not be a full series of Doctor Who next year: "Sherlock success will hit Doctor Who, says BBC1 Boss".
It took just minutes for a furious Moffat to strike back on Twitter: "The scheduling of the Dr Who has got NOTHING to do with Sherlock". In response to a message from fellow writer Neil Gaiman as to whether he was "being shafted", Moffat replied publicly: "It's not your imagination. Unbelievable. Unacceptable." While the Beeb amended its story to include Moffat's denial, Cohen has declined to issue any kind of clarification.
Since when? The shows been pulling in over 30% of the available audience, iPlayer is at an all-time high, and BBC America Ratings are increasing.The ratings are again at the Colin Baker/Sylvestor McCoy level, that's why.
Also, there were only four TV channels here in the 80's. Ratings for everything were generally higher than in today's world of cable, satellite and Freeview digital TV with their huge number of available channels.Since when? The shows been pulling in over 30% of the available audience, iPlayer is at an all-time high, and BBC America Ratings are increasing.The ratings are again at the Colin Baker/Sylvestor McCoy level, that's why.
Don't let the negative nellies convince you that smaller number of people is indicative of a slide for the show, it's indicative of the number of eyes watching TV period. If nobody's watching TV, obviously they aren't available.
okay, am I the only one completely stumped as to why the beeb is screwing so badly with a program that's obviously extremely popular (and no doubt making them bucket loads)?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.